Cited by 19Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyLipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Membrane Tethering of SepF, a Membrane Anchor for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Z-ring

Open access
Dey, Souvik, Zhou, Huan-Xiang·2022·Journal of Molecular Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Bacterial cell division begins with the formation of the Z-ring via polymerization of FtsZ and the localization of Z-ring beneath the inner membrane through membrane anchors. In Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), SepF is one such membrane anchor, but our understanding of the underlying mechanism is very limited. Here we used molecular dynamics simulations to characterize how SepF itself, a water-soluble protein, tethers to acidic membranes that mimic the Mtb inner membrane. In addition to an amphipathic helix (residues 1-12) at the N-terminus, membrane binding also occurs through two stretches of positively charged residues (Arg27-Arg37 and Arg95-Arg107) in the long linker preceding the FtsZ-binding core domain (residues 128-218). The additional interactions via the disordered linker stabilize the membrane tethering of SepF, and keep the core domain of SepF and hence the attached Z-ring close to the membrane. The resulting membrane proximity of the Z-ring in turn enables its interactions with and thus recruitment of two membrane proteins, FtsW and CrgA, at the late stage of cell division.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167817

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Pichoff, 2002, Unique and overlapping roles for ZipA and FtsA in septal ring assembly in Escherichia coli, EMBO J., 21, 685, 10.1093/emboj/21.4.685 · DOI
  2. Hamoen, 2006, SepF, a novel FtsZ-interacting protein required for a late step in cell division, Mol. Microbiol., 59, 989, 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04987.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Hale, 1997, Direct Binding of FtsZ to ZipA, an Essential Component of the Septal Ring Structure That Mediates Cell Division in E. coli, Cell, 88, 175, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81838-3 · DOI
  4. Pichoff, 2005, Tethering the Z ring to the membrane through a conserved membrane targeting sequence in FtsA, Mol. Microbiol., 55, 1722, 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04522.x · DOI
  5. Duman, 2013, Structural and genetic analyses reveal the protein SepF as a new membrane anchor for the Z ring, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, E4601, 10.1073/pnas.1313978110 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cameron, 2021, ZipA Uses a Two-Pronged FtsZ-Binding Mechanism Necessary for Cell Division, mBio., 12, e02529, 10.1128/mbio.02529-21 · DOI
  7. Loose, 2014, The bacterial cell division proteins FtsA and FtsZ self-organize into dynamic cytoskeletal patterns, Nat. Cell Biol., 16, 38, 10.1038/ncb2885 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Sogues, 2020, Essential dynamic interdependence of FtsZ and SepF for Z-ring and septum formation in Corynebacterium glutamicum, Nat. Commun., 11, 1641, 10.1038/s41467-020-15490-8 · DOI
  9. Gola, 2015, The essential role of SepF in mycobacterial division, Mol. Microbiol., 97, 560, 10.1111/mmi.13050 · DOI
  10. Salomon-Ferrer, 2013, Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit solvent particle mesh Ewald, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 9, 3878, 10.1021/ct400314y · DOI
  11. Maier, 2015, ff14SB: Improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 11, 3696, 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255 · DOI
  12. Piana, 2015, Water dispersion interactions strongly influence simulated structural properties of disordered protein states, J. Phys. Chem. B, 119, 5113, 10.1021/jp508971m · DOI
  13. Hicks, 2020, Sequence-dependent correlated segments in the intrinsically disordered region of ChiZ, Biomolecules., 10, 946, 10.3390/biom10060946 · DOI
  14. Dey, 2022, Sequence-dependent backbone dynamics of intrinsically disordered proteins, biorxiv
  15. Hicks, 2021, Fuzzy association of an intrinsically disordered protein with acidic membranes, JACS Au., 1, 66, 10.1021/jacsau.0c00039 · DOI
  16. Jackson, 2000, Phosphatidylinositol Is an Essential Phospholipid of Mycobacteria, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 30092, 10.1074/jbc.M004658200 · DOI
  17. Bernadó, 2009, A Self-Consistent Description of the Conformational Behavior of Chemically Denatured Proteins from NMR and Small Angle Scattering, Biophys. J ., 97, 2839, 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.08.044 · DOI
  18. Datta, 2002, Interaction between FtsZ and FtsW of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 24983, 10.1074/jbc.M203847200 · DOI
  19. Plocinski, 2011, Characterization of CrgA, a New Partner of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Peptidoglycan Polymerization Complexes, J. Bacteriol., 193, 3246, 10.1128/JB.00188-11 · DOI
  20. Das, 2015, Structure of CrgA, a cell division structural and regulatory protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, in lipid bilayers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, E119, 10.1073/pnas.1415908112 · DOI
  21. Qin, 2022, ReSMAP: Web Server for Predicting Residue-Specific Membrane-Association Propensities of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins, Membranes (Basel)., 12, 773, 10.3390/membranes12080773 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Dey, S., & Zhou, H.-X.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Huan-Xiang
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
434
Issue
21
Pages
167817
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295009413
Cited by
19
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (acceptedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (AI119178, GM118091)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Keywords
SepF, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Z-ring, membrane tethering, bacterial cell division, FtsZ polymerization, membrane anchor, amphipathic helix, disordered linker, FtsW, CrgA, inner membrane
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Bacterial Proteins, Cell Division, Cell Membrane, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Membrane Proteins, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review