Prediction of Quality-control Degradation Signals in Yeast Proteins
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Effective proteome homeostasis is key to cellular and organismal survival, and cells therefore contain efficient quality control systems to monitor and remove potentially toxic misfolded proteins. Such general protein quality control to a large extent relies on the efficient and robust delivery of misfolded or unfolded proteins to the ubiquitin-proteasome system. This is achieved via recognition of so-called degradation motifs-degrons-that are assumed to become exposed as a result of protein misfolding. Despite their importance, the nature and sequence properties of quality-control degrons remain elusive. Here, we have used data from a yeast-based screen of 23,600 17-residue peptides to build a predictor of quality-control degrons. The resulting model, QCDPred (Quality Control Degron Prediction), achieves good accuracy using only the sequence composition of the peptides as input. Our analysis reveals that strong degrons are enriched in hydrophobic amino acids and depleted in negatively charged amino acids, in line with the expectation that they are buried in natively folded proteins. We applied QCDPred to the yeast proteome, enabling us to analyse more widely the potential effects of degrons. As an example, we show a correlation between cellular abundance and degron potential in disordered regions of proteins. Together with recent results on membrane proteins, our work suggest that the recognition of exposed hydrophobic residues is a key and generic mechanism for proteome homeostasis. QCDPred is freely available as open source code and via a web interface.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Ubiquitin ligases: structure, function, and regulation
Zheng, N., & Shabek, N. (2017) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014922 · Cited by 1,499 · see citing works
Rosenzweig, R., Nillegoda, N. B., Mayer, M. P., & Bukau, B. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0133-3 · Cited by 1,285 · see citing works
A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications
Akdel, M., Pires, D. E. V., Pardo, E. P., Jänes, J., Zalevsky, A. O., Mészáros, B., Bryant, P., Good, L. L., Laskowski, R. A., Pozzati, G., et al. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00849-w · Cited by 675 · see citing works
Self-citationRapid protein stability prediction using deep learning representations
Blaabjerg, L. M., Kassem, M. M., Good, L. L., Jonsson, N., Cagiada, M., Johansson, K. E., Boomsma, W., Stein, A., & Lindorff-Larsen, K. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.82593 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Johansson, K. E., Mashahreh, B., Hartmann-Petersen, R., Ravid, T., & Lindorff-Larsen, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Ravid, Tommer
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 435
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167915
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4312140522
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF18OC0033950)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein quality control, ubiquitin-proteasome system, misfolded proteins, hydrophobic amino acids, sequence composition, intrinsically disordered regions, membrane proteins, yeast proteome
- MeSH terms
- Fungal Proteins, Peptides, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Proteome, Amino Acids, Acidic, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Proteolysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review