Missense3D-PPI: A Web Resource to Predict the Impact of Missense Variants at Protein Interfaces Using 3D Structural Data
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
ABSTRACT In 2019, we released Missense3D which identifies stereochemical features that are disrupted by a missense variant, such as introducing a buried charge. Missense3D analyses the effect of a missense variant on a single structure and thus may fail to identify as damaging surface variants disrupting a protein interface i.e., a protein-protein interaction (PPI) site. Here we present Missense3D-PPI designed to predict missense variants at PPI interfaces. Our development dataset comprised of 1,279 missense variants (pathogenic n=733, benign n=546) in 434 proteins and 545 experimental structures of PPI complexes. Benchmarking of Missense3D-PPI was performed after dividing the dataset in training (320 benign and 320 pathogenic variants) and testing (226 benign and 413 pathogenic). Structural features affecting PPI, such as disruption of interchain bonds and introduction of unbalanced charged interface residues, were analysed to assess the impact of the variant at PPI. Missense3D-PPI’s performance was superior to that of Missense3D: sensitivity 42% versus 8% and accuracy 58% versus 40%, p=4.23×10 −16 However, the specificity of Missense3D-PPI was slightly lower compared to Missense3D (84% versus 98%). On our dataset, Missense3D-PPI’s accuracy was superior to BeAtMuSiC (p=2.3×10 −5 ), mCSM-PPI2 (p=3.2×10 −12 ) and MutaBind2 (p=0.003). Missense3D-PPI represents a valuable tool for predicting the structural effect of missense variants on biological protein networks and is available at the Missense3D web portal ( http://missense3d.bc.ic.ac.uk/missense3d/indexppi.html ).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 25
- Authors
- Pennica, C., Hanna, G., Islam, S. A., Sternberg, M. J. E., & David, A.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- David, Alessia
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 435
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 168060
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7617523
- OpenAlex
- W4360843077
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/P023959/1, BB/T010487/1)
- Wellcome Trust (104955/Z/14/Z, 218242/Z/19/Z)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- missense mutations, protein-protein interfaces, variant effect prediction, pathogenicity prediction, protein structure, online resources
- MeSH terms
- DNA Mutational Analysis, Proteins, Software, Mutation, Missense
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review