High-resolution Cryo-EM Analysis of the Therapeutic Pseudomonas Phage Pa223
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) analysis of bacteriophages is a valuable method for deciphering virus composition and conformational plasticity. In this study, we present a high-resolution structural atlas of the Pseudomonas virus Pa223, a phage from the Bruynoghevirus genus that has recently been used in clinical cocktails for treating cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, as well as for compassionate care. By combining bioinformatics, proteomics, cryo-EM single particle analysis, and localized reconstruction, we annotated and built atomic models for eight structural polypeptide chains that form the icosahedral capsid and noncontractile tail. We discovered that the Pa223 capsid is decorated by a spike protein with a unique triple-β helix fold that has no structural homologs in the database. The Pa223 tail features six trimeric tail fibers extending upward, similar to but shorter than those found in phage T7. Unlike T7, the Pa223 tail is extended by two head-to-tail adaptors and sealed by a trimeric tail needle, similar to P22-like phages. We identified a protein bound around the outer perimeter of the portal protein, positioned similarly to the ejection protein gp72, which was identified in the Pseudomonas phage DEV, a Litunavirus phage, and a member of the reclassified Schitoviridae family. This structural clue led us to identify the Pa223 ejection proteins gp53, gp54, and gp56, which bioinformatically resemble those of phage T7 more closely than Schitoviridae. Thus, Pa223 contains various structural elements similar to those in P22-like, T7-like, and Litunavirus phages, providing a foundation for understanding the evolution of ejection proteins in Bruynogheviruses.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.07.479398 · Cited by 2,598 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · Cited by 2,596 · see citing works
Automated model building and protein identification in cryo-EM maps
Jamali, K., Käll, L., Zhang, R., Brown, A., Kimanius, D., & Scheres, S. H. W. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.16.541002 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Skolnick, J., Gao, M., Zhou, H., & Singh, S. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01114 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Hou, C.-F. D., Bellis, N., Lokareddy, R. K., Branston, S., Reid, J., Geier, R., Soriaga, A., Sim, L., Kyme, P., Birx, D. L., Lemire, S., & Cingolani, G.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Armata Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cingolani, Gino
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-11
- Volume
- 437
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 169386
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12400505
- OpenAlex
- W4413137482
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 298 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (acceptedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (U24 GM129541)
- University of California, Los Angeles
- NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM100888, R35 GM140733)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- phage tail structure, portal protein, bacteriophage T7, cystic fibrosis therapy, non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review