Cited by 4CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Synthetic Type III-E CRISPR-Cas Effectors for Programmable RNA-targeting

Open access
Brogan, Daniel J., Lin, Calvin P., Benetta, Elena Dalla, Wang, Tianqi, Chen, Fangying, Li, Harry, Lin, Claire, Komives, Elizabeth A. +1 more·2026·Journal of Molecular Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The recent discovery of the type III-E class of CRISPR-Cas effectors has reshaped our fundamental understanding of CRISPR-Cas evolution and classification. Type III-E effectors are composed of several Cas7-like domains and a single Cas11-like domain naturally fused together to create a single polypeptide capable of targeting and degrading RNA. Here we identified a novel type III-E-like effector composed of three Cas7 domains and a Cas1 domain which was not active but could be engineered into an active chimeric RNA-targeting Cas effector by domain additions and swaps from other type III-E effectors. The results reveal that various domains in type III-E effectors can be swapped for the equivalent domain from a different type III-E effector. Remarkably, the Cas1 domain located at the C-terminus of Cas7-1 could be swapped in place of the Cas11 domain located between the Cas7.1 and the Cas7.2 domains of DiCas7-11. The results reveal a new modality for engineering type III-E effectors from the blueprints found in nature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169566

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Brogan, D. J., Lin, C. P., Benetta, E. D., Wang, T., Chen, F., Li, H., Lin, C., Komives, E. A., & Akbari, O. S.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
  • Komives, Elizabeth A.
  • Akbari, Omar S.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-01
Volume
438
Issue
2
Pages
169566
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416746565
Cited by
4
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (RO1AI1900001)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (R01GM132825-04, DP2AI152071, R21RAI149161A)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
domain swapping, RNA degradation
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Gene Editing, RNA, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR-Cas Systems, CRISPR-Associated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review