Endometriosis after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with uterine morcellation: A case control study
Open accessAbstract
Study objective To compare the incidence of new-onset endometriosis after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) with uterine morcellation to traditional routes.Design Single center case-control study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2) of hysterectomies performed from January 2006 through December 2008.Patients Two hundred seventy-seven laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies with morcellation (cases) and 187 transvaginal or abdominal hysterectomies without morcellation (controls) were performed from January 2006 through December 2008.Interventions A total of 464 women underwent hysterectomy, 277 cases via laparoscopic supracervical approach (LSH) with morcellation and 187 performed either transvaginally or abdominally without morcellation. Repeat operative procedures were performed for other benign indications on 16 of 464 (3.5%) patients who had undergone prior hysterectomy.Measurements and main results One hundred two patients had endometriosis at the time of hysterectomy diagnosed by pathologic evaluation or gross visualization. In those without endometriosis, repeat operative procedures were performed for pain and bleeding in 3.3% (12/362). Sixty percent (3/5) of patients treated with LSH and 28.6% (2/7) of the control group were found to have newly diagnosed endometriosis, conferring a rate of 1.4% (3/217) in the LSH group and 1.4% (2/145) in the control subjects. In patients with endometriosis, repeat operative procedures for pain or bleeding occurred in 2.9% (3/102): 3/60 patients treated with LSH and none in the control group (0/42). Two of these 3 patients undergoing a second surgery had recurrent/continued endometriosis.Conclusion Newly diagnosed endometriosis was noted in 1.4% of patients after hysterectomy, with a similar incidence between the LSH and control groups. Reoperation for those with endometriosis at the time of LSH with morcellation was infrequent, but endometriosis was usually found. Further research is needed to delineate risk factors for development of de novo endometriosis after hysterectomy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
After hysterectomy, iatrogenic endometriosis is reported to occur at an incidence of 1.4 percent.
“while after hysterectomy, IE is reported to occur at an incidence of 1.4 percent [13,14].”
From Challenges in Diagnosis and Prevention of Iatrogenic Endometriosis as a Long-Term Surgical Complication after C-Section (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
Existing evidence describes symptom onset of iatrogenic endometriosis after c-section occurring anytime between the first menstruation after surgery and seven years following surgery.
“The existing evidence describes patients with symptom onset of iatrogenic endometriosis after c-section occurring anytime between the first menstruation after surgery and seven years following surgery”
From Challenges in Diagnosis and Prevention of Iatrogenic Endometriosis as a Long-Term Surgical Complication after C-Section (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Schuster, M. W., Wheeler, T. L., & Richter, H. E.
- Affiliations
- Prisma Health (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Corresponding author
- Richter, Holly E.
- ORCID
- Richter, Holly E.
- Venue
- Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-187
- ISSN
- 1553-4650 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3292633
- OpenAlex
- W2114438984
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Keywords
- laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, uterine morcellation, hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy, abdominal hysterectomy, reoperation, endometriosis recurrence, surgical complications, minimally invasive gynecologic surgery
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Middle Aged, Postoperative Pain, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Complications, Reoperation, Uterine Hemorrhage, Incidence, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Postoperative Hemorrhage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review