Cited by 48Endometriosis Research and TreatmentPelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and Treatments

Urodynamic Evaluation and Anorectal Manometry Pre- and Post-operative Bowel Shaving Surgical Procedure for Posterior Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Pilot Study

Spagnolo, E., Zannoni, L., Raimondo, D., Ferrini, G., Mabrouk, M., Benfenati, A., Villa, G., Bertoldo, V. +1 more·2014·Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Abstract

Study objective To analyze bowel and urinary function in patients with posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) >30 mm in largest diameter at transvaginal ultrasound before and after surgical nerve-sparing excision.Design Prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification III).Setting Tertiary care university hospital in Bologna, Italy.Patients Twenty-five patients with posterior DIE were included in the study between June 2011 and December 2012. Patients did not receive hormone therapy for at least 3 months before and 6 months after surgery.Interventions Patients underwent urodynamic studies and anorectal manometry before and after nerve-sparing laparoscopic excision of the posterior DIE nodule.Measurements and main results Intestinal and urinary function was evaluated in patients with bulky posterior DIE using urodynamic and anorectal manometry. Results of urodynamic studies and anorectal manometry were similar before and after nerve-sparing surgical excision of the posterior DIE nodule. Urodynamic studies demonstrated a high prevalence of voiding dysfunction, whereas anorectal manometry showed no reduction in rectoanal inhibitory reflex and hypertone of the internal anal sphincter.Conclusions Patients with posterior DIE >30 mm in greatest diameter demonstrate preoperative dysfunction at urodynamic study and anorectal manometry, probably due to DIE per se. The nerve-sparing surgical approach seems not to influence the motility or sensory capacity of the bladder and the rectosigmoid colon.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.05.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 48

Authors
Spagnolo, E., Zannoni, L., Raimondo, D., Ferrini, G., Mabrouk, M., Benfenati, A., Villa, G., Bertoldo, V., & Seracchioli, R.
Affiliations
IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
Venue
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1080-1085
ISSN
1553-4650 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089689442
Cited by
48
References
31
Citations by year
2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
deep infiltrating endometriosis, nerve-sparing surgery, laparoscopic resection, urodynamic function, anorectal manometry, voiding dysfunction, rectoanal inhibitory reflex, bowel function, bladder function, endometrioma size
MeSH terms
Adult, Anal Canal, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Italy, Manometry, Laparoscopy, Pilot Projects, Postoperative Complications, Postoperative Period, Prospective Studies, Rectum, Urodynamics, Preoperative Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review