Changing epidemiology of candidemia in a medical center in middle Taiwan
Open accessAbstract
Background Candidemia remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the health care setting, and the epidemiology of Candida infection is changing.Methods Clinical and laboratory data from patients with candidemia were collected retrospectively at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan from July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2012 (a 36-month period). Demographics, clinical characteristics, and drug susceptibility of the invading Candida species of patients at the onset of candidemia were analyzed and compared with previous study from January 1, 2001 to June 30, 2003 (a 30-month period).Results A total of 209 episodes of candidemia in 205 patients were identified in this study period. When compared with the previous study period, more patients were admitted for medical conditions at percentages ranging from 49.5% to 69.8%; the incidence rate of health care-associated candidemia increased from 0.76 to 1.14 per 1000 discharges; the proportion of Candida albicans in patients with candidemia decreased from 64.8% to 43.6% whereas the proportion of Candida glabrata increased greatly from 1.1% to 21.6% and the proportions of Candida tropicalis and Candida parapsilosis were slightly elevated (19.8-22.0% and 2.2-7.3%, respectively). All of the C. albicans isolates remained susceptible to fluconazole, whereas 66.7% of C. glabrata isolates were dose-dependent susceptible, and 4.4% of C. glabrata isolates and 11.6% C. tropicalis isolates were resistant. There was one C. glabrata and one Candida guilliermondii resistant to echinocandin. The predictors for 30-day mortality included the high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, use of parenteral nutrition, underlying malignancy, liver cirrhosis, and neutropenia whereas candidemia by C. parapsilosis or C. glabrata is a favorable predictor when compared with C. albicans.Conclusion The distribution of Candida species in candidemia was changed. Although C. albicans remained the major species, the isolation of non-C. albicans spp., especially C. glabrata, increased. Patients with candidemia still had high mortalities due to severity of illness and underlying conditions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Resistance to fluconazole is common.
“In particular, resistance to fluconazole is common [30,43,44]”
From Global and Multi-National Prevalence of Fungal Diseases-Estimate Precision (2017) · cites this paper as [43]
The Discussion reports an overall fluconazole resistance rate of 4.95% among the clinical Candida isolates, contrary to the unqualified claim that resistance is common. The Antifungal susceptibility section distinguishes resistance from reduced susceptibility: only 4.4% of C. glabrata isolates were resistant, although 66.7% were dose-dependent susceptible. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 56
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [26]26. Malani A, Hmoud J, Chiu L, Carver PL, Bielaczyc A, Kauffman CA. Candida glabrata fungemia: experience in a tertiary hospital. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:975e81.
- Authors
- Hii, I.-M., Chang, H.-L., Lin, L.-C., Lee, Y.-L., Liu, Y.-M., Liu, C.-E., Chen, C.-H., Cheng, Y.-R., & Chang, C.-Y.
- Affiliations
- Changhua Christian Hospital (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Chang, Chih-Yen
- Venue
- Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 306-315
- ISSN
- 1684-1182 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984388269
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Keywords
- candidemia, Candida glabrata, Candida albicans, non-albicans Candida, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Candida guilliermondii, antifungal susceptibility, echinocandin resistance, fluconazole resistance, 30-day mortality, APACHE II score, mortality risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Cross Infection, Demography, Female, Humans, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, Taiwan, Incidence, Survival Analysis, Young Adult, Candidemia, Tertiary Care Centers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review