Conducting a Research Interview
Abstract
Interviews are a cornerstone of modern health care research and can be used by both experienced and novice researchers to gather data for projects. For qualitative research, the semistructured or unstructured interview is often used and this can be carried out in various ways. Methods discussed in this directed reading include the face-to-face interview, group interviews such as focus groups, and remote interview conducted by telephone or using the computer. These methods are discussed in detail including advantages and disadvantages of each as well as accompanying practical considerations. Regardless of the method used, there are several matters to be considered in the process of planning, conducting, and analyzing interviews. These consist of initially selecting appropriate participants for the study, preparing a research protocol, and writing useful interview questions designed to capture the information required. It is also important for the researcher to be able to develop and demonstrate rapport with the participant and use attentive listening. Ethical issues relating to the conduct of interviews are also considered, including consent, privacy, and confidentiality. Finally, there is a discussion on the method of analyzing qualitative interview data to prepare for its dissemination in the form of an article or presentation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interviews are a cornerstone of modern research and can be used by both experienced and novice researchers to gather data for projects.
“Interviews are a cornerstone of modern research and can be used by both experienced and novice researchers to gather data for projects (Bolderston, 2012).”
From The Psycho-Emotive Effects of AI-Generated Fake News on Social Media Users (2026) · cites this paper as Bolderston, 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Igelström, H., Hauffman, A., Alfonsson, S., Sjöström, J., Cajander, Å., & Johansson, B. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16604 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The Psycho-Emotive Effects of AI-Generated Fake News on Social Media Users
Grigoryan, G., Eddine Salmi, S., Huichun, N., & Shi, J. (2026) · Modern Psychology · doi:10.46991/sbmp/2026.9.1.034
- Authors
- Bolderston, A.
- Affiliations
- BC Cancer Agency (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Bolderston, Amanda
- ORCID
- Bolderston, Amanda
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-76
- ISSN
- 1876-7982 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8654
- OpenAlex
- W1967049484
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 13.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- research interviews, qualitative research, semi-structured interviews, unstructured interviews, face-to-face interviews, focus groups, telephone interviews, remote interviews, interview question design, participant selection, rapport building, attentive listening, research ethics, informed consent, confidentiality, interview analysis, research dissemination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review