The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies
Gibson, E. (1998) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1 · Cited by 2,537
Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval.
Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996) · Memory · doi:10.1016/b978-012102570-0/50010-0 · Cited by 486
Cited by
Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension
Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.007 · Cited by 853
Self-citationReconciling time, space and function: A new dorsal–ventral stream model of sentence comprehension
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2013) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.010 · Cited by 329
Reconsolidation in humans opens up declarative memory to the entrance of new information
Forcato, C., Rodríguez, M. L. C., Pedreira, M. E., & Maldonado, H. (2010) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2009.08.006 · Cited by 147
On the automaticity of language processing.
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Moors, A. (2017) · Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. · doi:10.1037/15969-010 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-166
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136102486
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.007
- The paper
- Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B. (2006). Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
