Cited by 57Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Consistency of flashbulb memories of September 11 over long delays: Implications for consolidation and wrong time slice hypotheses

Open access
Kvavilashvili, Lia, Mirani, Jennifer, Schlagman, Simone, Foley, Kerry, Kornbrot, Diana E.·2009·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jml.2009.07.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 57

Authors
Kvavilashvili, L., Mirani, J., Schlagman, S., Foley, K., & Kornbrot, D. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Kvavilashvili, Lia
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
556-572
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124671863
Cited by
57
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 21 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
flashbulb memory, September 11 attacks, memory consistency, memory consolidation, emotional events, memory distortion, rehearsal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review