Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A micro–macro approach to rubber-like materials. Part III: The micro-sphere model of anisotropic Mullins-type damage

Open access
Göktepe, Serdar, Miehe, Christian·2005·Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids

Abstract

Abstract A micromechanically based non-affine network model for finite rubber elasticity and viscoelasticity was discussed in Parts I and II [Miehe, C., Goktepe, S., Lulei, F., 2004. A micro–macro approach to rubber-like materials. Part I: The non-affine micro-sphere model of rubber elasticity. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 52, 2617–2660; Miehe, C., Goktepe, S., 2005. A micro–macro approach to rubber-like materials. Part II: Viscoelasticity model for polymer networks. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, published on-line, doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.04.006 .] of this work. In this follow-up contribution, we further extend the micro-sphere network model such that it incorporates a deformation-induced softening commonly referred to as the Mullins effect. To this end, a continuum formulation is constructed by a superimposed modeling of a crosslink-to-crosslink (CC) and a particle-to-particle (PP) network. The former is described by the non-affine elastic network model proposed in Part I. The Mullins-type damage phenomenon is embedded into the PP network and micromechanically motivated by a breakdown of bonds between chains and filler particles. Key idea of the constitutive approach is a two-step procedure that includes (i) the set up of micromechanically based constitutive models for a single chain orientation and (ii) the definition of the macroscopic stress response by a directly evaluated homogenization of state variables defined on a micro-sphere of space orientations. In contrast to previous works on the Mullins effect, our formulation inherently describes a deformation-induced anisotropy of the damage as observed in experiments. We show that the experimentally observed permanent set in stress–strain diagrams is achieved by our model in a natural way as an anisotropy effect. The performance of the model is demonstrated by means of several numerical experiments including the solution of boundary-value problems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.04.010

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Göktepe, S., & Miehe, C.
Venue
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
53
Issue
10
Pages
2259-2283
ISSN
0022-5096 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062806594
Cited by
189
References
2
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A micro–macro approach to rubber-like materials. Part III: The micro-sphere model of anisotropic Mullins-type damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmps.2005.04.010
The paper
Göktepe, S., & Miehe, C. (2005). A micro–macro approach to rubber-like materials. Part III: The micro-sphere model of anisotropic Mullins-type damage. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2005.04.010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.