The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A micro–macro approach to rubber-like materials. Part III: The micro-sphere model of anisotropic Mullins-type damage
Open accessAbstract
Abstract A micromechanically based non-affine network model for finite rubber elasticity and viscoelasticity was discussed in Parts I and II [Miehe, C., Goktepe, S., Lulei, F., 2004. A micro–macro approach to rubber-like materials. Part I: The non-affine micro-sphere model of rubber elasticity. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 52, 2617–2660; Miehe, C., Goktepe, S., 2005. A micro–macro approach to rubber-like materials. Part II: Viscoelasticity model for polymer networks. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, published on-line, doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.04.006 .] of this work. In this follow-up contribution, we further extend the micro-sphere network model such that it incorporates a deformation-induced softening commonly referred to as the Mullins effect. To this end, a continuum formulation is constructed by a superimposed modeling of a crosslink-to-crosslink (CC) and a particle-to-particle (PP) network. The former is described by the non-affine elastic network model proposed in Part I. The Mullins-type damage phenomenon is embedded into the PP network and micromechanically motivated by a breakdown of bonds between chains and filler particles. Key idea of the constitutive approach is a two-step procedure that includes (i) the set up of micromechanically based constitutive models for a single chain orientation and (ii) the definition of the macroscopic stress response by a directly evaluated homogenization of state variables defined on a micro-sphere of space orientations. In contrast to previous works on the Mullins effect, our formulation inherently describes a deformation-induced anisotropy of the damage as observed in experiments. We show that the experimentally observed permanent set in stress–strain diagrams is achieved by our model in a natural way as an anisotropy effect. The performance of the model is demonstrated by means of several numerical experiments including the solution of boundary-value problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of the elastic properties of rubber
James, H. M., & Guth, E. (1943) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1723785 · Cited by 1,230
On the large deformation behaviour of reinforced rubber at different temperatures
Lion, A. (1997) · Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids · doi:10.1016/s0022-5096(97)00028-8 · Cited by 297
Cited by
Challenges in Multiscale Modeling of Polymer Dynamics
Li, Y., Abberton, B., Kröger, M., & Liu, W. (2013) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym5020751 · Cited by 222
“materials, with all the relevant physical mechanisms considered [19,29–33].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Göktepe, S., & Miehe, C.
- Venue
- Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2259-2283
- ISSN
- 0022-5096 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062806594
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A micro–macro approach to rubber-like materials. Part III: The micro-sphere model of anisotropic Mullins-type damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmps.2005.04.010
- The paper
- Göktepe, S., & Miehe, C. (2005). A micro–macro approach to rubber-like materials. Part III: The micro-sphere model of anisotropic Mullins-type damage. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2005.04.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.