The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low Back Pain in Australian Adults. Prevalence and Associated Disability
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence ranges of low back pain (LBP) together with any related disability in Australian adults. DESIGN: A population-based survey. METHODS: The survey was mailed in June 2001 to a stratified random sample of 3000 Australian adults selected from the Electoral Roll. Demographic variables of respondents were compared with the Australian population. Selective response bias was investigated using wave analysis. A range of prevalence data was derived, as were disability scores using the Chronic Pain Grade. RESULTS: There was a 69% response rate. There was little variation between the sample and the Australian adult population. There was no significant selective response bias found. The sample point prevalence was estimated at 25.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.6-27.5), 12-month prevalence was 67.6% (95% CI, 65.5-69.7), and lifetime prevalence was 79.2%, (95% CI, 77.3-81.0). In the previous 6-month period, 42.6% (95% CI, 40.4-44.8) of the adult population had experienced low-intensity pain and low disability from it. Another 10.9% (95% CI, 9.6-12.3) had experienced high intensity-pain but still low disability from this pain. However, 10.5% (95% CI, 9.2-11.9) had experienced high-disability LBP. CONCLUSION: LBP is a common problem in the Australian adult population, yet most of this is low-intensity and low-disability pain. Nevertheless, over 10% had been significantly disabled by LBP in the past 6 months. Data from this study will provide a better understanding of the magnitude of the LBP problem in Australia, the need for access to health care resources, and also strategic research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.
Babbie, E., & Dillman, D. A. (1982) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2068433 · Cited by 6,852
Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms
Kuorinka, I., Jonsson, B., Kilbom, A., Vinterberg, H., Biering-Sørensen, F., Andersson, G., & Jørgensen, K. (1987) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-x · Cited by 5,103
Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.
Osmond, M. W., & Dillman, D. A. (1979) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2577403 · Cited by 5,023
Grading the severity of chronic pain
Von Korff, M., Ormel, J., Keefe, F. J., & Dworkin, S. F. (1992) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4 · Cited by 3,022
How to Conduct Your Own Survey
Sudman, S., Salant, P., & Dillman, D. A. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152021 · Cited by 1,927
The Prevalence of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1966 to 1998
Walker, B. F. (2000) · Journal of Spinal Disorders · doi:10.1097/00002517-200006000-00003 · Cited by 1,144
Self-citation(1990) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90035-r · Cited by 1,024
Descriptive Epidemiology of Low-back Pain and Its Related Medical Care in the United States
DEYO, R. A., & TSUI-WU, Y.-J. (1987) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-198704000-00013 · Cited by 842
Stephens, S. A., Alreck, P. L., & Settle, R. B. (1986) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2069328 · Cited by 467
The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research
Smith, B. H., Penny, K. I., Purves, A. M., Munro, C., Wilson, B., Grimshaw, J., Chambers, A. W., & Smith, C. W. (1997) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(97)03347-2 · Cited by 433
Cited by
Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings
Fillingim, R. B., King, C. D., Ribeiro-Dasilva, M. C., Rahim-Williams, B., & Riley, J. L. (2009) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.001 · Cited by 2,766
The epidemiology of low back pain
Hoy, D., Brooks, P., Blyth, F., & Buchbinder, R. (2010) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2010.10.002 · Cited by 2,037
Epidural Steroids in the Management of Chronic Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review
Abdi, S. (2007) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2007/10/185 · Cited by 479
Measuring the global burden of low back pain
Hoy, D., March, L., Brooks, P., Woolf, A., Blyth, F., Vos, T., & Buchbinder, R. (2010) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.002 · Cited by 420
Beinart, N. A., Goodchild, C. E., Weinman, J. A., Ayis, S., & Godfrey, E. L. (2013) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.027 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Walker, B. F., Muller, R., & Grant, W. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 238-244
- ISSN
- 0161-4754 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046533487
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low Back Pain in Australian Adults. Prevalence and Associated Disability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.02.002
- The paper
- Walker, B. F., Muller, R., & Grant, W. D. (2004). Low Back Pain in Australian Adults. Prevalence and Associated Disability. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.02.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.