The Effectiveness of Exercise for the Management of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Injuries of the Elbow, Forearm, Wrist, and Hand: A Systematic Review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise compared to other interventions, placebo/sham intervention, or no intervention in improving self-rated recovery, functional recovery, clinical, and/or administrative outcomes in individuals with musculoskeletal disorders and injuries of the elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1990 to 2015. Paired reviewers independently screened studies for relevance and assessed the risk of bias using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. We synthesized the evidence using the best evidence synthesis methodology. RESULTS: We identified 5 studies with a low risk of bias. Our review suggests that, for patients with persistent lateral epicondylitis, (1) adding concentric or eccentric strengthening exercises to home stretching exercises provides no additional benefits; (2) a home program of either eccentric or concentric strengthening exercises leads to similar outcomes; (3) home wrist extensor strengthening exercises lead to greater short-term improvements in pain reduction compared to "wait and see"; and (4) clinic-based, supervised exercise may be more beneficial than home exercises with minimal improvements in pain and function. For hand pain of variable duration, supervised progressive strength training added to advice to continue normal physical activity provides no additional benefits. CONCLUSION: The relative effectiveness of stretching vs strengthening for the wrist extensors remains unknown for the management of persistent lateral epicondylitis. The current evidence shows that the addition of supervised progressive strength training does not provide further benefits over advice to continue normal physical activity for hand pain of variable duration.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interventions such as joint protection, exercise therapy, mobilization, and modalities in hand therapy have well-established benefits for pain and function.
“Interventions such as joint protection [16], exercise therapy [17], mobilization [18], and modalities [19] in hand therapy have well-established benefits for pain and function.”
From Development and usability testing of a web-based and therapist-assisted coping skills program for managing psychosocial problems in individuals with hand and upper limb injuries: Mixed methods study (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
For citation [17], only the exercise-therapy part of the sentence is at issue. The Conclusion reports benefits for some exercise programs in persistent lateral epicondylitis, but says supervised strength training provided no additional benefit for hand pain; the Discussion calls the role of strengthening unclear. The source therefore does not establish broad benefits for pain and function in hand therapy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Menta, R., Randhawa, K., Côté, P., Wong, J. J., Yu, H., Sutton, D., Varatharajan, S., Southerst, D., D'Angelo, K., Cox, J., Brown, C., Dion, S., Mior, S., Stupar, M., Shearer, H. M., Lindsay, G. M., Jacobs, C., & Taylor-Vaisey, A.
- Affiliations
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CA)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Randhawa, Kristi
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 507-520
- ISSN
- 0161-4754 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1741875183
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
- Keywords
- exercise therapy, musculoskeletal disorders, elbow injuries, forearm injuries, wrist injuries, hand injuries, lateral epicondylitis, stretching, home exercise program, hand pain, functional recovery, analgesia
- MeSH terms
- Accidents, Traffic, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Adult, Cooperative Behavior, Exercise Therapy, Female, Forearm Injuries, Hand Injuries, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Ontario, Pain Measurement, Tennis Elbow, Wounds and Injuries, Wrist Injuries, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Disease Management, Recovery of Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review