Cited by 67Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applications

The physical mechanism of “inhomogeneous” magnetization transfer MRI.

Manning, Alan P., Chang, Kimberley L., MacKay, Alex L., Michal, Carl A.·2017·Journal of Magnetic Resonance

Abstract

Inhomogeneous MT (ihMT) is a new magnetic resonance imaging technique that shows promise for myelin selectivity. Materials with a high proportion of lipids, such as white matter tissue, show a reduced intensity in magnetic resonance images acquired with selective prepulses at positive and negative offsets simultaneously compared to images with a single positive or negative offset prepulse of the same power. This effect was initially explained on the basis of hole-burning in inhomogeneously broadened lines of the lipid proton spin system. Our results contradict this explanation. ihMT in lipids can be understood with a simple spin-1 model of a coupled methylene proton pair. More generally, Provotorov theory can be used to consider the evolution of dipolar order in the non-aqueous spins during the prepulses. We show that the flip-angle dependence of the proton spectrum of a model lipid system (Prolipid-161) following dipolar order generation is in quantitative agreement with the model. In addition, we directly observe dipolar order and ihMT signals in the non-aqueous components of Prolipid-161 and homogeneously-broadened systems (hair, wood, and tendon) following ihMT prepulses. The observation of ihMT signals in tendon suggests that the technique may not be as specific to myelin as previously thought. Our work shows that ihMT occurs because of dipolar couplings alone, not from a specific type of spectral line broadening as its name suggests.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.11.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other quantitative MRI techniques such as calibrated T1w/T2w ratio mapping, inhomogeneous magnetization transfer (ihMT) imaging, and T2 relaxation-based myelin water imaging (MWI) are likely less affected by fiber orientation.

    “other quantitative MRI techniques such as calibrated T1w/T2w ratio mapping (Ganzetti et al., 2014; Uddin et al., 2018), inhomogeneous magnetization transfer (ihMT) imaging (Manning et al., 2017; Swanson et al., 2017), and T2 relaxation-based myelin water imaging MWI (Prasloski et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2018) are likely less affected by fiber orientation”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manning, A. P., Chang, K. L., MacKay, A. L., & Michal, C. A.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Michal, Carl A.
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
274
Pages
125-136
ISSN
1090-7807 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2549967941
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2017-09-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
inhomogeneous magnetization transfer, dipolar coupling, spin-1 model, hole burning, inhomogeneous broadening, dipolar order, white matter, tendons, hair, wood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review