SpecDB: A relational database for archiving biomolecular NMR spectral data
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
NMR is a valuable experimental tool in the structural biologist's toolkit to elucidate the structures, functions, and motions of biomolecules. The progress of machine learning, particularly in structural biology, reveals the critical importance of large, diverse, and reliable datasets in developing new methods and understanding in structural biology and science more broadly. Biomolecular NMR research groups produce large amounts of data, and there is renewed interest in organizing these data to train new, sophisticated machine learning architectures and to improve biomolecular NMR analysis pipelines. The foundational data type in NMR is the free-induction decay (FID). There are opportunities to build sophisticated machine learning methods to tackle long-standing problems in NMR data processing, resonance assignment, dynamics analysis, and structure determination using NMR FIDs. Our goal in this study is to provide a lightweight, broadly available tool for archiving FID data as it is generated at the spectrometer, and grow a new resource of FID data and associated metadata. This study presents a relational schema for storing and organizing the metadata items that describe an NMR sample and FID data, which we call Spectral Database (SpecDB). SpecDB is implemented in SQLite and includes a Python software library providing a command-line application to create, organize, query, backup, share, and maintain the database. This set of software tools and database schema allow users to store, organize, share, and learn from NMR time domain data. SpecDB is freely available under an open source license at https://github.rpi.edu/RPIBioinformatics/SpecDB.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Representing structures of the multiple conformational states of proteins
Ramelot, T. A., Tejero, R., & Montelione, G. T. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102703 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Fraga, K. J., Huang, Y. J., Ramelot, T. A., Swapna, G. V. T., Lashawn Anak Kendary, A., Li, E., Korf, I., & Montelione, G. T.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Montelione, Gaetano T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 342
- Pages
- 107268
- ISSN
- 1090-7807 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9922030
- OpenAlex
- W4285605280
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM120574, R35 GM141818)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- relational databases, free induction decay, relational database schema, SQLite, NMR data processing, chemical shift assignment, NMR structure determination, open source software
- MeSH terms
- Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Software, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review