Cited by 44Bone Tissue Engineering Materialsbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesSurface Treatment and Coatings

Dielectric and biodegradation properties of biodegradable nano-hydroxyapatite/starch bone scaffold

Open access
You, Beh Chong, Meng, Cheng Ee, Mohd Nasir, Nashrul Fazli, Mohd Tarmizi, Emma Ziezie, Fhan, Khor Shing, Kheng, Eng Swee, Abdul Majid, Mohd Shukry, Mohd Jamir, Mohd Ridzuan·2022·Journal of Materials Research and Technology

Abstract

This study is aim to investigate the dielectric properties (dielectric constant, ε′ and loss factor, ε′′) and the biodegradation properties of the nano-hydroxyapatite/starch bone scaffold with various starch proportion in simulated body fluid. The nano-hydroxyapatite/starch bone scaffolds with starch proportions 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 wt.% were fabricated. The ε′ and ε′′ of nano-hydroxyapatite/starch composite decrease when frequency increases. However, it increases when starch proportion and temperature increase. The biodegradation properties of the nano-hydroxyapatite/starch bone scaffold can be improved when the dielectric properties and porosity are enhanced. The enhancement of dielectric properties and porosity is due to the increment of starch proportion. The nano-hydroxyapatite/starch bone scaffold with the high starch proportion exhibits nano-hydroxyapatite/starch interfaces with strong intermolecular interactions that can stabilize biodegradation and biomineralization. The dielectric properties of the simulated body solutions are highly sensitive to the variation of the ion concentrations (calcium and phosphate). The nano-hydroxyapatite/starch bone scaffold with 80 wt.% starch proportion exhibits significant dielectric and biodegradation properties. It has potential to be a biodegradable inorganic/organic bone scaffold.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.014

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biodegradable matrices recommended for hard tissue tissue engineering must be uniformly degraded in the human body during bone mineralization to improve bone tissue replacement and growth processes.

    “Biodegradable matrices recommended for hard tissue TE must be uniformly degraded in the human body during bone mineralization to improve bone tissue replacement and growth processes [77].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Wittkowske C, Reilly GC, Lacroix D, Perrault CM. In Vitro bone cell models: impact of fluid shear stress on bone formation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2016;4:87. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00087. · DOI
  2. Shakir M, Jolly R, Khan MS, Iram Ne, Khan HM. Nano- hydroxyapatite/chitosan-starch nanocomposite as a novel bone construct: synthesis and in vitro studies. Int J Biol Macromol 2015;80:282e92. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijbiomac.2015.05.009. · DOI
  3. Chaudhuri B, Bhadra D, Moroni L, Pramanik K. Myoblast differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on graphene oxide and electrospun graphene oxide e polymer composite fi brous meshes: importance of graphene oxide conductivity and dielectric constant on their biocompatibility. Biofabrication 2015;7:015009. https:// doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/1/015009. · DOI
  4. Oudadesse H, Mostafa A, Bui XV, Foad E, Kamal G, Legal Y, et al. Physico-chemical assessment of biomimetic nano- hydroxyapatite/polymer matrix for use in bony surgery. Int Biol Biomed J 2011;5:103e10.
  5. Nihmath A, Ramesan MT. Fabrication, characterization and dielectric studies of NBR/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 2017;27:481e9. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10904-016-0490-8. · DOI
  6. Kim CG, Han KS, Lee S, Kim MC, Kim SY, Nah J. Fabrication of biocompatible polycaprolactone e hydroxyapatite composite filaments for the FDM 3D printing of bone scaffolds. Appl Sci 2021;11:6351. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146351. · DOI
  7. Sundarabharathi L, Ponnamma D, Parangusan H, Chinnaswamy M, Al-Maadeed MAA. Effect of anions on the structural, morphological and dielectric properties of hydrothermally synthesized hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. SN Appl Sci 2019;2:1e13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019- 1807-3. · DOI
  8. Feng P, Peng S, Shuai C, Gao C, Yang W, Bin S, et al. In situ generation of hydroxyapatite on biopolymer particles for fabrication of bone scaffolds owning bioactivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020;12. https://doi.org/10.1021/ acsami.0c13768. · DOI
  9. Leonor IB, Ito A, Onuma K, Kanzaki N, Reis RL. In vitro bioactivity of starch thermoplastic/hydroxyapatite composite biomaterials : an in situ study using atomic force microscopy. Biomaterials 2003;24:579e85. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00371-X. · DOI
  10. Barab as R, Bizo L, Stefan R. In vitro biological activity comparison of some hydroxyapatite-based composite materials using simulated body fluid. Cent Eur J Chem 2013;11:1583e98. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11532-013-0293-5. · DOI
  11. Tavangar M, Heidari F, Hayati R, Tabatabaei F, Vashaee D, Tayebi L. Manufacturing and characterization of mechanical, biological and dielectric properties of hydroxyapatite-barium titanate nanocomposite scaffolds. Ceram Int 2020;46:9086e95. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ceramint.2019.12.157. · DOI
  12. Mohamad AH, Abdullah OG, Saeed SR. Effect of very fine nanoparticle and temperature on the electric and dielectric properties of MC-PbS polymer nanocomposite films. Results Phys 2019;16:102898. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.rinp.2019.102898. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Zhang S, Lin Z, Jiang G, Wang J, Wang D. Construction of chelation structure between Ca 2þ and starch via reactive extrusion for improving the performances of thermoplastic starch. Compos Sci Technol 2018;159:59e69. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.02.027. · DOI
  14. Nourmohammadi J, Shahriarpanah S, Asadzadehzanjani N, Khaleghpanah S. Biomimetic apatite layer formation on a novel citrate starch scaffold suitable for bone tissue engineering applications. Starch Staerke 2016;68:1e7. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201500216. · DOI
  15. Feng P, Wu P, Gao C, Yang Y, Guo W, Yang W, et al. A multimaterial scaffold with tunable properties: toward bone tissue repair. Adv Sci 2018;5:1e15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ advs.201700817. · DOI
  16. Bordbar-khiabani A, Ebrahimi S, Yarmand B. In-vitro corrosion and bioactivity behavior of tailored calcium phosphate-containing zinc oxide coating prepared by plasma electrolytic oxidation. Corrosion Sci 2020;173:108781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2020.108781. · DOI
  17. Arau ´jo M, Miola M, Bertone E, Baldi G, Perez J, Vern e E. On the mechanism of apatite-induced precipitation on 45S5 glass pellets coated with a natural-derived polymer. Appl Surf Sci 2015;353:137e49. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.apsusc.2015.06.088. · DOI
  18. Mahmoud EM, Sayed M, El-Kady AM, Elsayed H, Naga SM. In vitro and in vivo study of naturally derived alginate/ hydroxyapatite bio composite scaffolds. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;165:1346e60. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijbiomac.2020.10.014. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Shahriarpanah S, Nourmohammadi J, Amoabediny G. Fabrication and characterization of carboxylated starch- chitosan bioactive scaffold for bone regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol 2016;93:1069e78. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijbiomac.2016.09.045. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Massimi M, Stampella A, Devirgiliis LC, Rizzitelli G, Barbetta A, Dentini M, et al. Dielectric characterization of hepatocytes in suspension and embedded into two different polymeric scaffolds. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2013;102:700e7. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.09.015. · DOI
  21. Pietrucha K, Marzec E, Kudzin M. Pore structure and dielectric behaviour of the 3D collagen-DAC scaffolds designed for nerve tissue repair. Int J Biol Macromol 2016;92:1298e306. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijbiomac.2016.08.029. · DOI
  22. Leonor IB, Kim H, Balas F, Kawashita M, Reis RL, Kokubo T, et al. Alkaline treatments to render starch-based biodegradable polymers self-mineralizable. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2007;1:425e35. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.54. · DOI
  23. Yabutsuka T. Biomimetic porous bone-like apatite coatings on metals , organic polymers and apatite microparticles. In: Al-Naib UMB, editor. Recent adv. Porous ceram.; 2018. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71390. IntechOpen. · DOI
  24. Zia I, Mirza S, Jolly R, Rehman A, Ullah R, Shakir M. Trigonella foenum graecum seed polysaccharide coupled nano hydroxyapatite-chitosan: a ternary nanocomposite for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 2019;124:88e101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.059. · DOI
  25. Fragal EH, Cellet TSP, Fragal VH, Witt MA, Companhoni MVP, Ueda-nakamura T, et al. Biomimetic nanocomposite based on hydroxyapatite mineralization over chemically modified cellulose nanowhiskers: an active platform for osteoblast proliferation. Int J Biol Macromol 2019;125:133e42. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.004. · DOI
  26. Houaoui A, Szczodra A, Lallukka M, El-guermah L, Agniel R, Pauthe E. New generation of hybrid materials based on gelatin and bio-active glass particles for bone tissue engineering. Biomolecules 2021;11:444. https://doi.org/ 10.20944/preprints202101.0594.v1. · DOI
  27. € Ozsa gıro glu TB, Nasu ¨n-Saygılı G. The impact of gelatin weight ratio on hydroxyapatite-gelatin composites and their SBF behaviour. Macromol Symp 2015;352:8e15. https:// doi.org/10.1002/masy.201400115. · DOI
  28. Liu J, Qiang Y, Alvarez O, Du E. Electrical impedance characterization of erythrocyte response to cyclic hypoxia in sickle cell disease. ACS Sens 2019;4:1783e90. https://doi.org/ 10.1021/acssensors.9b00263. · DOI
  29. Liu J, Qiang Y, Du E. Dielectric spectroscopy of red blood cells in sickle cell disease. Electrophoresis 2021;42:667e75. https:// doi.org/10.1002/elps.202000143. · DOI
  30. Jia L, Chesnokova O, Oleinikov I, Qiang Y, Oleinikov AV, Du E. Optimization of in vitro trophoblast assay for real-time impedimetric sensing of trophoblast-erythrocyte interactions in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Anal Bioanal Chem 2020;412:3915e23. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00216-020-02413-1. · DOI
  31. Mancuso E, Shah L, Jindal S, Serenelli C, Michail Z, Khanbareh H, et al. Additively manufactured BaTiO 3 composite scaffolds: a novel strategy for load bearing bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C 2021;126:112192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112192. · DOI
  32. Li Y, Dai X, Bai Y, Liu Y, Wang Y, Liu O, et al. Electroactive BaTiO 3 nanoparticle-functionalized fibrous scaffolds enhance osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Nanomed 2017;12:4007e18. https://doi.org/10.2147/ IJN.S135605. · DOI
  33. Chaudhuri B, Mondal B, Ray SK, Sarkar SC. A novel biocompatible conducting polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)- polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-hydroxyapatite (HAP) composite scaffolds for probable biological application. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2016;143:71e80. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.colsurfb.2016.03.027. · DOI
  34. Arya A ALS. Effect of salt concentration on dielectric properties of Li-ion conducting blend polymer electrolytes. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 2018;29:17903e20. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10854-018-9905-3. · DOI
  35. Cheng EM, Fareq M, Shahriman AB, Afendi M, Zulkarnay Z, Khor SF, et al. Development of low cost microwave detection system for salinity and sugar detection. Int J Mech Mechatronics Eng IJMME-IJENS 2014;14:59e71.
  36. Hussain WA, Hussein AA, Khalaf JM, Al-mowali AH, Sultan AA. Dielectric properties and a.c. Conductivity of epoxy/alumina silicate NGK composites. Adv Chem Eng Sci 2015;5:282e9. https://doi.org/10.4236/aces.2015.53028. · DOI
  37. Arya A, Sadiq M, Sharma AL. Temperature and salt- dependent dielectric properties of blend solid polymer electrolyte complexed with LiBOB. Mater Today Proc 2019;12:554e64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.03.098. · DOI
  38. Gh O, Yahya A, Salwan AKS. Electrical conductivity and dielectric characteristics of in situ prepared PVA/HgS nanocomposite films. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 2016;27:3591e8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-015-4196-4. · DOI
  39. Zangina T, Hassan J, Azis S. Structural , electrical conductivity and dielectric relaxation behavior of LiHf 2 (PO 4 ) 3 ceramic powders. J Australas Ceram Soc 2017;54:307e16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-017-0155-2. · DOI
  40. Bruna A, Arjmand M, Sundararaj U, Elida R, Bretas S. Novel composites of copper nanowire/PVDF with superior dielectric properties. Polymer (Guildf) 2014;55:226e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.11.045. · DOI
  41. Saji J, Umapathi A, Manohara SR, Navya PN, Kumawat M, Prakash D, et al. Polyvinyl alcohol scaffold incorporated with silver nanoparticles and titanium dioxide: electrical, dielectric, dye degradation, and antibacterial properties. Adv Mech Eng 2021:367e79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16- 0942-8_36. Springer Singapore. · DOI
  42. Cetiner S, Sirin S, Olariu M, Sarac AS. Frequency and temperature dependence of dielectric behaviors for conductive acrylic composites. Adv Polym Technol 2016;35:1e10. https://doi.org/10.1002/adv.21523. · DOI
  43. Sanchez AG, Prokhorov E, Mora-Garcı ´a GL-BAG, Kovalenko Y, Miñoz EMR, Raucci MG, et al. Chitosan-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites: effect of interfacial layer on mechanical and dielectric properties. Mater Chem Phys 2018;217:151e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.06.062. · DOI
  44. Sun W, Lu X, Jiang J, Zhang X, Hu P, Li M, et al. Dielectric and energy storage performances of polyimide/BaTiO 3 nanocomposites at elevated temperatures. J Appl Phys 2017;121:244101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4989973. 112. · DOI
  45. Hemalatha KS, Sriprakash G, Prasad MVNA, Damle R, Rukmani K. Temperature dependent dielectric and conductivity studies of polyvinyl alcohol-ZnO nanocomposite films by impedance spectroscopy. J Appl Phys 2015;118:154103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4933286. · DOI
  46. Wang Z, Zhou W, Dong L, Sui X, Cai H, Zuo J. Dielectric spectroscopy characterization of relaxation process in Ni/ epoxy composites. J Alloys Compd 2016;682:738e45. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.025. · DOI
  47. Nunes-pereira J, Silva AR, Ribeiro C, Carabineiro SAC, Buijnsters JG. Nanodiamonds/poly (vinylidene fluoride) composites for tissue engineering applications. Compos Part B 2017;111:37e44. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compositesb.2016.12.014. · DOI
  48. Sambudi NS, Cho S, Cho K. Porous hollow hydroxyapatite microspheres synthesized by spray pyrolysis using a microalga template: preparation, drug delivery, and bioactivity. RSC Adv 2016;6:43041e8. https://doi.org/10.1039/ C6RA03147A. · DOI
  49. Bovand D, Allazadeh MR, Rasouli S, Khodadad E, Borhani E. Studying the effect of hydroxyapatite particles in osteoconductivity of Ti-HA bioceramic. J Australas Ceram Soc 2018;55:395e403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-018- 0247-7. · DOI
  50. Shuai C, Peng B, Feng P, Yu L, Lai R, Min A. In situ synthesis of hydroxyapatite nanorods on graphene oxide nanosheets and their reinforcement in biopolymer scaffold. J Adv Res 2022;35:13e24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2021.03.009. · DOI
  51. Shuai C, Yang W, Feng P, Peng S, Pan H. Accelerated degradation of HAP/PLLA bone scaffold by PGA blending facilitates bioactivity and osteoconductivity. Bioact Mater 2021;6:490e502. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.bioactmat.2020.09.001. · DOI
  52. Li J, Baker BA, Mou X, Ren N, Qiu J, Boughton RI. Biopolymer/ calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater 2014;3:469e84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ adhm.201300562. · DOI
  53. Mallakpour S, Rashidimoghadam S. Preparation , characterization , and in vitro bioactivity study of glutaraldehyde crosslinked chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol)/ ascorbic acid-MWCNTs bionanocomposites. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;144:389e402. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijbiomac.2019.12.073. · DOI
  54. Tripathi M, Tripathi SK. Electrical studies on ionic liquid- based gel polymer electrolyte for its application in EDLCs. Ionics (Kiel) 2017;23:2735e46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581- 017-2051-8. · DOI
  55. Lima LF, Vieira AL, Mukai H, Andrade CMG, Fernandes PRG. Electric impedance of aqueous KCl and NaCl solutions: salt concentration dependence on components of the equivalent electric circuit. J Mol Liq 2017;241:530e9. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.06.069. · DOI
  56. Harun NI, Ali RM, Ali AMM, Yahya MZA. Dielectric behaviour of cellulose acetate-based polymer electrolytes. Ionics (Kiel) 2012;18:599e606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-011-0653-0. · DOI
  57. Shah N, Poyani S, Rana VA. Dielectric and electrical properties of coconut water and distilled water in the frequency range 20 Hz to 2 MHz at different temperatures. Ionics (Kiel) 2015;21:3217e22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581- 015-1506-z. · DOI
  58. Rana VA, Pandit TR. Dielectric spectroscopic and molecular dynamic study of aqueous solutions of paracetamol. J Mol Liq 2019;290:111203. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.molliq.2019.111203. · DOI
  59. Guo S, Han X, Peng Y, Li J. Frequency dependence of conductivity characteristics of seawater ionic solution under magnetic field. MATEC Web Conf 2016;67:2021. https:// doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/2016 6702021. EDP Sciences. · DOI
  60. Hu B, Zhu H. Anomalous dielectric behaviors of electrolyte solutions confined in graphene oxide nanochannels. Sci Rep 2021;11:1e11. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41598-021-98326-9. · DOI
  61. Zhu H, Ghoufi A, Szymczyk A, Balannec B, Morineau D. Anomalous dielectric behavior of nanoconfined electrolytic solutions. Phys Rev Lett 2012;109:107801. https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.107801. · DOI
  62. Ashoorirad M, Saviz M, Fallah A. On the electrical properties of collagen macromolecule solutions: role of collagen-water interactions. J Mol Liq 2020;300:112344. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.112344. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
You, B. C., Meng, C. E., Mohd Nasir, N. F., Mohd Tarmizi, E. Z., Fhan, K. S., Kheng, E. S., Abdul Majid, M. S., & Mohd Jamir, M. R.
Affiliations
Universiti Malaysia Perlis (MY)
Venue
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
18
Pages
3215-3226
ISSN
  • 2214-0697 (ISSN-L)
  • 2238-7854
OpenAlex
W4224257152
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Materials Research and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (RACER/1/2019/STG07/UNIMAP/2)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Surface Treatment and Coatings
Keywords
hydroxyapatite nanoparticles, starch, bone scaffolds, dielectric properties, biodegradation, simulated body fluid, porosity, biomineralization, calcium and phosphate ions, biodegradable bone substitutes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review