Nanostructured 3D bioprinting of PLA with bioglass-CNT scaffolds for osseus tissue graft manufacturing
Open accessAbstract
Bone involvement promoted by aging and accidents has raised interest in biomaterials and biofabrication technologies for bone regeneration purposes. Thus, 3D printing technology has gained prominence in the production of scaffolds due to its versatility in producing complex geometries with interconnected pores. In this work, composite scaffolds of poly (lactic acid) (PLA), bioglass (BG) and carbon nanotubes (CNT) were produced by 3D printing, using hexagonal, honeycomb-like geometry interspersed. The samples were analyzed in terms of chemical structure, crystallinity and morphology using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. The thermal stability of the composite was evaluated by thermogravimetry and the mechanical properties by compression tests. The cell viability was determined by Alamar Blue. The results that raman spectroscopy confirmed the interaction of BG in the polymer matrix by new peaks in the spectrum between 1400 and 2600 cm−1 and the presence of the D, G and 2D bands of the CNTs. In terms of compressive strength, PLA scaffolds with 2 mm inner spacing demonstrated higher compressive strength of 14.88 ± 2.35 MPa, while PLA/CNT higher apparent compressive modulus of 0.58 ± 0.36 GPa. In cell viability, statistical tests showed that there was no significant difference between scaffolds with 2 and 4 mm inner spacing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One advantage of combining PLA with bioceramics is the possibility of additive manufacturing, enabling a high degree of personalization.
“One advantage of combining PLA with bioceramics is the possibility of additive manufacturing, enabling a high degree of personalization [169,188,189,190,191,192].”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [191]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Vach Agocsova, S., Culenova, M., Birova, I., Omanikova, L., Moncmanova, B., Danisovic, L., Ziaran, S., Bakos, D., & Alexy, P. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16124267 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vasconcelos, E. V., da Luz, F. B., da Paz, S. P. A., dos Reis, M. A. L., da Silva, A. C. R., Passos, M. F., Barboza, C. A. G., Monteiro, S. N., & Candido, V. S.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR)
- Military Institute of Engineering (BR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Research and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- 5923-5938
- ISSN
- 2214-0697 (ISSN-L)
- 2238-7854
- OpenAlex
- W4322487782
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Materials Research and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Federal University of Para
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Keywords
- 3D bioprinting, polylactic acid, bioactive glass, carbon nanotubes, composite scaffolds, bone tissue engineering, bone regeneration, compressive strength, cell viability, thermal stability, polymer nanocomposites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review