A survey on trust management for Internet of Things
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Access control and trust management approaches have been reviewed to protect the security and privacy of IoT.
“Recently, access control [58] and trust management [59] approaches have been reviewed to protect the security and privacy of IoT.”
From Empowering things with intelligence: a survey of the progress, challenges, and opportunities in artificial intelligence of things (2021) · cites this paper as [59]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 152 · Cited by 1,155
- Authors
- Yan, Z., Zhang, P., & Vasilakos, A. V.
- Affiliations
- Xidian University (CN)
- Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- Kuwait University (KW)
- Corresponding author
- Yan, Zheng
- Venue
- Journal of Network and Computer Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 42
- Pages
- 120-134
- ISSN
- 1084-8045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074709832
- Cited by
- 1,155
- References
- 152
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 141 · 2019: 146 · 2018: 145 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 10 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 108.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Network and Computer Applications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Keywords
- trust management, Internet of Things, trust property, user privacy, information security, context-aware services, research challenges, research model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
