Cited by 108Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and TreatmentIon Channels and Receptors

Pharmacological evaluation of the selective spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain in the rat

LaBuda, Christopher J., Little, Patrick J.·2005·Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Abstract

Rodent models of neuropathic pain are used to investigate the underlying mechanisms of pain associated with damage to peripheral nerves and to evaluate the efficacy of novel compounds. However, few models have been adequately characterized and the validity of many models remains unclear. The present experiment examined the activity of known anti-allodynic compounds in the L5 spinal nerve ligation (SNL) model of peripheral mononeuropathy in the rat, a modified version of the L5/L6 SNL model [S.H. Kim, J.M. Chung, An experimental model for peripheral neuropathy produced by segmental spinal nerve ligation in the rat, Pain 50 (1992) 355-363]. Tactile sensitivity was measured 7-21 days post-surgery using von Frey monofilaments before and following treatment with gabapentin (30, 60 and 120 mg/kg), morphine (1, 3 and 6 mg/kg), amitriptyline (1.5, 3 and 10 mg/kg), fluoxetine (3, 10 and 30 mg/kg), WIN55,212-2 (0.5, 1 and 2.5 mg/kg), indomethacin (1 and 5 mg/kg) or U-50,488H (3 and 6 mg/kg). Compared to sham-operated control animals, L5 SNL animals displayed significant tactile allodynia in the ipsilateral hindpaw that was completely reversed by treatment with gabapentin, morphine, and WIN55,212-2, partially reversed by amitriptyline and fluoxetine, and unaffected by U-50,488H or indomethacin. The robust effects of the non-selective cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 and morphine support reports in the literature that systemic cannabinoid receptor agonists and opioids are active in neuropathic pain. These results suggest that the L5 SNL model can be utilized to determine the anti-allodynic activity of novel compounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.11.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gabapentin successfully attenuated mechanical allodynia in the SNL model, whereas amitriptyline, fluoxetine, and indomethacin failed to show similar effects.

    “Gabapentin successfully attenuated mechanical allodynia in this model, however, several other commonly prescribed neuropathic pain medications including amitriptyline, fluoxetine and indomethacin failed to show similar effects.80”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 108

Authors
LaBuda, C. J., & Little, P. J.
Corresponding author
LaBuda, Christopher J.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
144
Issue
2
Pages
175-181
ISSN
0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969561355
Cited by
108
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
neuropathic pain, spinal nerve ligation, allodynia, tactile sensitivity, gabapentin, morphine, WIN 55,212-2, cannabinoid receptor agonists, amitriptyline, fluoxetine, U50,488H, indomethacin, peripheral mononeuropathy, rat model
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Analgesics, Opioid, Animals, Denervation, Disease Models, Animal, Ligation, Male, Morpholines, Naphthalenes, Neuralgia, Nociceptors, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Physical Stimulation, Spinal Nerves, Treatment Outcome, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Neurosurgical Procedures, Receptors, Cannabinoid, Benzoxazines, Rats, Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review