Probing the limits of delay intolerance: Preliminary young adult data from the Delay Frustration Task (DeFT)
Abstract
Delay intolerance/aversion is one amongst a number of candidate neuropsychological endophenotypes for ADHD. Pilot data suggest that, because of potential ceiling effects, simple choice measures of delay tolerance used for children are probably not appropriate for adolescents and adults. The Delay Frustration Task (DeFT) is a new measure of delay intolerance, designed to be used in a similar form with adolescents and adults as well as children. In it delay frustration is indexed as the number and duration of responses made on a response key during a series of unpredictable and unsignalled delay periods, which interrupt the completion of a simple computer-based tests. The aim of this study was to provide preliminary data on the applicability of the task in a sample of young adults. The DeFT was administered to 49 male and female undergraduate students selected from a normal population-base. Their mean age was 23.14 (S.D.=1.54). Three measures of delay frustration were recorded across time intervals during the response window; the number of responses, their duration and their combined product (total time button was pressed) was calculated for each second interval bin during the post-response delay period. The AARS and HADS were used as screening questionnaires for ADHD and anxiety behaviour, respectively. The results indicated that young adults with high-ADHD symptoms scores pressed the button more than those with low ADHD scores during the post-response delay condition. While both groups increased responding across time within intervals this was significantly more marked in the high-ADHD symptom group. These effects became more pronounced when anxiety was controlled. Young adults with high-ADHD symptoms appear to be more sensitive to the imposition of unscheduled and unsignalled delay during a simple maths test. DeFT may provide a useful index of delay tolerance in young adults with ADHD. Future research needs to examine DeFT performance in different age groups and in clinical and non-clinical populations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are several other measures of impulsive decision-making, including delay aversion tasks or other methods of evaluating discounting of delayed rewards.
“There are several other measures of impulsive decision-making, including delay aversion tasks or other methods of evaluating discounting of delayed rewards (Bitsakou et al., 2006, Knutson et al., 2001, Muller et al., 2006, Rachlin et al., 1991).”
From Characterizing heterogeneity in children with and without ADHD based on reward system connectivity (2015) · cites this paper as Bitsakou et al., 2006
ADHD children respond inappropriately to the unexpected imposition of delay.
“For instance, ADHD children respond inappropriately to the unexpected imposition of delay (Bitsakou et al, 2006) and extinction of reward (Sagvolden et al., 1998); prematurely disengage from long and challenging tasks (Scime and Norvilitis, 2006); show more activity than controls during delay (Antrop et al., 2003); are biased towards task responses tied to immediate rewards (Tripp and Alsop, 2001)”
From Context-dependent Dynamic Processes in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Differentiating Common and Unique Effects of State Regulation Deficits and Delay Aversion (2010) · cites this paper as Bitsakou et al, 2006
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Bitsakou, P., Antrop, I., Wiersema, J. R., & Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Southampton (GB)
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J.S.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-44
- ISSN
- 0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092654461
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- young adults, ADHD symptoms, anxiety, neuropsychological assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Frustration, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Time Factors, Recognition, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review