Application and comparison of classification algorithms for recognition of Alzheimer's disease in electrical brain activity (EEG)
Abstract
The early detection of subjects with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for effective appliance of treatment strategies. Here we explored the ability of a multitude of linear and non-linear classification algorithms to discriminate between the electroencephalograms (EEGs) of patients with varying degree of AD and their age-matched control subjects. Absolute and relative spectral power, distribution of spectral power, and measures of spatial synchronization were calculated from recordings of resting eyes-closed continuous EEGs of 45 healthy controls, 116 patients with mild AD and 81 patients with moderate AD, recruited in two different centers (Stockholm, New York). The applied classification algorithms were: principal component linear discriminant analysis (PC LDA), partial least squares LDA (PLS LDA), principal component logistic regression (PC LR), partial least squares logistic regression (PLS LR), bagging, random forest, support vector machines (SVM) and feed-forward neural network. Based on 10-fold cross-validation runs it could be demonstrated that even tough modern computer-intensive classification algorithms such as random forests, SVM and neural networks show a slight superiority, more classical classification algorithms performed nearly equally well. Using random forests classification a considerable sensitivity of up to 85% and a specificity of 78%, respectively for the test of even only mild AD patients has been reached, whereas for the comparison of moderate AD vs. controls, using SVM and neural networks, values of 89% and 88% for sensitivity and specificity were achieved. Such a remarkable performance proves the value of these classification algorithms for clinical diagnostics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A predictive accuracy of 90% considering the basic EEG characteristics and the probability of future decline in MCI subjects has been shown.
“A predictive accuracy of 90% considering the basic EEG characteristics and the probability of future decline in MCI subjects has been shown. 54 , 55 , 56 , 57”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 324
- Authors
- Lehmann, C., Koenig, T., Jelic, V., Prichep, L., John, R. E., Wahlund, L.-O., Dodge, Y., & Dierks, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Bern (CH)
- Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- University of Neuchâtel (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Lehmann, Christoph
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 342-350
- ISSN
- 0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092685533
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- School of Medicine, New York University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, EEG, early detection, machine learning classifiers, spectral power, spatial synchrony, random forest, support vector machine, artificial neural networks, linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, mild Alzheimer's disease, sensitivity and specificity
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Alzheimer Disease, Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electroencephalography, Humans, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Cluster Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review