Cited by 103Muscle activation and electromyography studiesMotor Control and AdaptationUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research

AnimatLab: A 3D graphics environment for neuromechanical simulations

Cofer, David, Cymbalyuk, Gennady, Reid, James, Zhu, Ying, Heitler, William J., Edwards, Donald H.·2010·Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Abstract

The nervous systems of animals evolved to exert dynamic control of behavior in response to the needs of the animal and changing signals from the environment. To understand the mechanisms of dynamic control requires a means of predicting how individual neural and body elements will interact to produce the performance of the entire system. AnimatLab is a software tool that provides an approach to this problem through computer simulation. AnimatLab enables a computational model of an animal's body to be constructed from simple building blocks, situated in a virtual 3D world subject to the laws of physics, and controlled by the activity of a multicellular, multicompartment neural circuit. Sensor receptors on the body surface and inside the body respond to external and internal signals and then excite central neurons, while motor neurons activate Hill muscle models that span the joints and generate movement. AnimatLab provides a common neuromechanical simulation environment in which to construct and test models of any skeletal animal, vertebrate or invertebrate. The use of AnimatLab is demonstrated in a neuromechanical simulation of human arm flexion and the myotactic and contact-withdrawal reflexes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.01.005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cofer, D., Cymbalyuk, G., Reid, J., Zhu, Y., Heitler, W. J., & Edwards, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
Corresponding author
Edwards, Donald H.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
187
Issue
2
Pages
280-288
ISSN
0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093435740
Cited by
103
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Georgia State University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM065762, P20GM065762)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
Keywords
Hill-type muscle model, sensorimotor control, computational neuroscience software
MeSH terms
Animals, Arm, Biomechanical Phenomena, Computer Graphics, Computer Simulation, Humans, Models, Anatomic, Models, Neurological, Motor Neurons, Nerve Net, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Muscle Spindles, Physical Stimulation, Sensory Receptor Cells, Reflex, Software, Neural Networks, Computer, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review