Cited by 97Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

A coaxial optrode as multifunction write-read probe for optogenetic studies in non-human primates

Open access
Ozden, Ilker, Wang, Jing, Lu, Yao, May, Travis, Lee, Joonhee, Goo, Werapong, O'Shea, Daniel J., Kalanithi, Paul +5 more·2013·Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Abstract

Background Advances in optogenetics have led to first reports of expression of light-gated ion-channels in non-human primates (NHPs). However, a major obstacle preventing effective application of optogenetics in NHPs and translation to optogenetic therapeutics is the absence of compatible multifunction optoelectronic probes for (1) precision light delivery, (2) low-interference electrophysiology, (3) protein fluorescence detection, and (4) repeated insertion with minimal brain trauma.New method Here we describe a novel brain probe device, a "coaxial optrode", designed to minimize brain tissue damage while microfabricated to perform simultaneous electrophysiology, light delivery and fluorescence measurements in the NHP brain. The device consists of a tapered, gold-coated optical fiber inserted in a polyamide tube. A portion of the gold coating is exposed at the fiber tip to allow electrophysiological recordings in addition to light delivery/collection at the tip.Results Coaxial optrode performance was demonstrated by experiments in rodents and NHPs, and characterized by computational models. The device mapped opsin expression in the brain and achieved precisely targeted optical stimulation and electrophysiology with minimal cortical damage.Comparison with existing methods Overall, combined electrical, optical and mechanical features of the coaxial optrode allowed a performance for NHP studies which was not possible with previously existing devices.Conclusions Coaxial optrode is currently being used in two NHP laboratories as a major tool to study brain function by inducing light modulated neural activity and behavior. By virtue of its design, the coaxial optrode can be extended for use as a chronic implant and multisite neural stimulation/recording.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.06.011

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 97

Authors
Ozden, I., Wang, J., Lu, Y., May, T., Lee, J., Goo, W., O'Shea, D. J., Kalanithi, P., Diester, I., Diagne, M., Deisseroth, K., Shenoy, K. V., & Nurmikko, A. V.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Stanford Health Care (US)
  • Connecticut College (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ozden, Ilker
  • Nurmikko, Arto V.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
219
Issue
1
Pages
142-154
ISSN
0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166377999
Cited by
97
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DP1OD006409)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020016)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (DP1HD075623)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
optogenetics, non-human primates, light-gated ion channels, electrophysiology, optical stimulation, chronic neural recording
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Electrodes, Epoxy Compounds, Fluorescence, Macaca mulatta, Metals, Mice, Transgenic, Monte Carlo Method, Primates, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Temperature, Phantoms, Imaging, Rats, Long-Evans, Mice, Rats, Optical Fibers, Opsins, Microtechnology, Electrophysiological Phenomena, Optogenetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review