A coaxial optrode as multifunction write-read probe for optogenetic studies in non-human primates
Open accessAbstract
Background Advances in optogenetics have led to first reports of expression of light-gated ion-channels in non-human primates (NHPs). However, a major obstacle preventing effective application of optogenetics in NHPs and translation to optogenetic therapeutics is the absence of compatible multifunction optoelectronic probes for (1) precision light delivery, (2) low-interference electrophysiology, (3) protein fluorescence detection, and (4) repeated insertion with minimal brain trauma.New method Here we describe a novel brain probe device, a "coaxial optrode", designed to minimize brain tissue damage while microfabricated to perform simultaneous electrophysiology, light delivery and fluorescence measurements in the NHP brain. The device consists of a tapered, gold-coated optical fiber inserted in a polyamide tube. A portion of the gold coating is exposed at the fiber tip to allow electrophysiological recordings in addition to light delivery/collection at the tip.Results Coaxial optrode performance was demonstrated by experiments in rodents and NHPs, and characterized by computational models. The device mapped opsin expression in the brain and achieved precisely targeted optical stimulation and electrophysiology with minimal cortical damage.Comparison with existing methods Overall, combined electrical, optical and mechanical features of the coaxial optrode allowed a performance for NHP studies which was not possible with previously existing devices.Conclusions Coaxial optrode is currently being used in two NHP laboratories as a major tool to study brain function by inducing light modulated neural activity and behavior. By virtue of its design, the coaxial optrode can be extended for use as a chronic implant and multisite neural stimulation/recording.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
So far, optogenetics has had little success in altering behavior in non-human primates.
“Although minimal success has been achieved to date, several groups are currently investing significant resources in using optogenetics to generate behavioral changes in non-human primates 138–143.”
From DISSECTING OCD CIRCUITS: FROM ANIMAL MODELS TO TARGETED TREATMENTS: Review: Dissecting OCD Circuits: Animals to Treatments (2015) · cites this paper as [139]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 97
- Authors
- Ozden, I., Wang, J., Lu, Y., May, T., Lee, J., Goo, W., O'Shea, D. J., Kalanithi, P., Diester, I., Diagne, M., Deisseroth, K., Shenoy, K. V., & Nurmikko, A. V.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Stanford Health Care (US)
- Connecticut College (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ozden, Ilker
- Nurmikko, Arto V.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 219
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 142-154
- ISSN
- 0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3789534
- OpenAlex
- W2166377999
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 6.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (DP1OD006409)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020016)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (DP1HD075623)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- optogenetics, non-human primates, light-gated ion channels, electrophysiology, optical stimulation, chronic neural recording
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Electrodes, Epoxy Compounds, Fluorescence, Macaca mulatta, Metals, Mice, Transgenic, Monte Carlo Method, Primates, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Temperature, Phantoms, Imaging, Rats, Long-Evans, Mice, Rats, Optical Fibers, Opsins, Microtechnology, Electrophysiological Phenomena, Optogenetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review