Semi-automated registration-based anatomical labelling, voxel based morphometry and cortical thickness mapping of the mouse brain
Open accessAbstract
Background Morphoanatomical MRI methods have recently begun to be applied in the mouse. However, substantial differences in the anatomical organisation of human and rodent brain prevent a straightforward extension of clinical neuroimaging tools to mouse brain imaging. As a result, the vast majority of the published approaches rely on tailored routines that address single morphoanatomical readouts and typically lack a sufficiently-detailed description of the complex workflow required to process images and quantify structural alterations.New method Here we provide a detailed description of semi-automated registration-based procedures for voxel based morphometry, cortical thickness estimation and automated anatomical labelling of the mouse brain. The approach relies on the sequential use of advanced image processing tools offered by ANTs, a flexible open source toolkit freely available to the scientific community.Results To illustrate our procedures, we described their application to quantify morphological alterations in socially-impaired BTBR mice with respect to normosocial C57BL/6J controls, a comparison recently described by us and other research groups. We show that the approach can reliably detect both focal and large-scale grey matter alterations using complementary readouts.Comparison with existing methods No detailed operational workflows for mouse imaging are available for direct comparison with our methods. However, empirical assessment of the mapped inter-strain differences is in good agreement with the findings of other groups using analogous approaches.Conclusion The detailed operational workflows described here are expected to help the implementation of rodent morphoanatomical methods by non-expert users, and ultimately promote the use of these tools across the preclinical neuroimaging community.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MRI studies have revealed decreased gray matter volume in the dorsofrontal, cingulate, retrosplenial, occipital and parietal cortex, as well as in subcortical areas including lateral and posterior thalamus, posterior hypothalamus and ventral hippocampus, but increased volume in the olfactory bulbs, medial prefrontal and insular cortex, amygdala and dorsal hippocampus in BTBR mice.
“MRI studies have revealed decreased gray matter volume in the dorsofrontal, cingulate, retrosplenial, occipital and parietal cortex, as well as in subcortical areas including lateral and posterior thalamus, posterior hypothalamus and ventral hippocampus, but increased volume in the olfactory bulbs, medial prefrontal and insular cortex, amygdala and dorsal hippocampus [87, 270].”
From Autism spectrum disorder: neuropathology and animal models (2017) · cites this paper as [270]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 60
- Authors
- Pagani, M., Damiano, M., Galbusera, A., Tsaftaris, S. A., & Gozzi, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Trento (IT)
- Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
- IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Pagani, Marco
- Gozzi, Alessandro
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 267
- Pages
- 62-73
- ISSN
- 0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2331242735
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- mouse brain imaging, voxel-based morphometry, image registration, BTBR mice, social dysfunction, C57BL/6J mice, interstrain differences
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Organ Size, Pattern Recognition, Automated
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review