Cited by 83Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Distribution of brain atrophy in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Kril, Jillian J., Macdonald, Virginia, Patel, Smita, Png, Francoise, Halliday, Glenda M.·2005·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Marked brain atrophy occurs in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) yet substantial variation between cases is seen. Recently, a four-level staging scheme which reflects increasing disease duration, severity of dementia and degree of neurodegeneration was described. In the present study, the extent and magnitude of atrophy in behavioral variant FTD and its relationship to disease duration and pathological subtype was further evaluated by quantifying the volume of 30 anatomically-defined regions. A validated point count technique was applied to 17 patients with FTD (9 Pick's disease, 6 dementia lacking distinctive histology, 2 FTD with motor neuron disease) and 21 controls. Atrophy was seen in all brain regions except the inferior frontal cortex and area 37. As might be expected, increasing severity of atrophy occurred with increasing disease duration and stage however measurable atrophy was more widespread than indicated by the staging scheme. Furthermore, severity of atrophy was not related to pathological subtype. Frontal, limbic and temporal regions appeared to be severely affected early in the disease process with temporal lobe atrophy the best predictor of disease duration. White matter, more posterior regions and the subcortex were affected later in the disease. These findings demonstrate a pattern of selective vulnerability which progresses over time. Furthermore, they demonstrate that although patients with a similar clinical subtype may have differing underlying histopathology, the pattern, severity and progression of brain atrophy is the same. This suggests that the regional pattern of neurodegeneration, rather than the type of histopathology influences the clinical syndrome in FTD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jns.2005.02.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 83

Authors
Kril, J. J., Macdonald, V., Patel, S., Png, F., & Halliday, G. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Kril, Jillian J.
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
232
Issue
1-2
Pages
83-90
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075075098
Cited by
83
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, brain atrophy, disease duration, Pick's disease, temporal lobe atrophy, white matter atrophy, subcortical atrophy, histological subtypes, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrophy, Brain, Dementia, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Degeneration, Phenotype, Temporal Lobe, Motor Neuron Disease, Disease Progression, Pick Disease of the Brain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review