Cited by 100Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFatty Acid Research and Health

Plasma endocannabinoid levels in multiple sclerosis

Jean-Gilles, L., Feng, S., Tench, C.R., Chapman, V., Kendall, D.A., Barrett, D.A., Constantinescu, C.S.·2009·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the CNS. Therapies that affect the endocannabinoid (EC) system may have immunomodulatory, symptomatic and neuroprotective effects. Aim The aim of this study was to determine how levels of EC and related compounds are altered in MS. Methods Plasma and whole blood were collected from 24 MS patients (10 relapsing-remitting (RR); 8 secondary-progressive (SP); 6 primary-progressive (PP); 19 females; 25-66 years) and 17 controls (10 females; 22-62 years). Plasma EC and related compounds were quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), cannabinoid receptors CB(1) and CB(2) mRNA were measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Results Anandamide (AEA) and palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) were higher in RRMS compared to controls (p=0.001 and p=0.027). AEA, PEA and oleoylethanolamide were also increased in SPMS plasma (p=0.001, p=0.004, and p=0.005). PPMS patients had higher AEA plasma levels compared to controls (p=0.009). FAAH mRNA was decreased in SPMS (p=0.04) but not in RRMS or PPMS blood. CB(1) (p=0.012) and CB(2) mRNA (p=0.003) were increased in the PPMS. Conclusion The EC system is altered in MS. It may be dynamically modulated depending on the subtype of the disease, but further studies with larger subgroups are needed to confirm this.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jns.2009.07.021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 33 · Cited by 100

Authors
Jean-Gilles, L., Feng, S., Tench, C. R., Chapman, V., Kendall, D. A., Barrett, D. A., & Constantinescu, C. S.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Constantinescu, C.S.
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
287
Issue
1-2
Pages
212-215
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010535402
Cited by
100
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Nottingham
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, endocannabinoid system, anandamide, palmitoylethanolamide, oleoylethanolamide, fatty acid amide hydrolase, CB1 receptor, CB2 receptor, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, primary progressive multiple sclerosis, disease subtypes
MeSH terms
Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolases, Adult, Aged, Amides, Amidohydrolases, Arachidonic Acids, Brain, Brain Chemistry, Cannabinoids, Chromatography, Liquid, Disability Evaluation, Ethanolamines, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Oleic Acids, Palmitic Acids, RNA, Messenger, Mass Spectrometry, Cytoprotection, Receptors, Cannabinoid, Polyunsaturated Alkamides, Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators, Endocannabinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review