Cited by 60Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

Factors associated with delay to medical recognition in two Canadian multiple sclerosis cohorts

Kingwell, Elaine, Leung, Alexander L., Roger, Elaine, Duquette, Pierre, Rieckmann, Peter, Tremlett, Helen·2010·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Long referral and diagnostic delays can impact both the opportunity for early therapeutic intervention and estimates of MS incidence and prevalence. We investigated factors associated with diagnostic or referral delays within two geographically distinct MS Canadian cohorts and the association between referral delay and disability at first clinic visit. Adult-onset MS patients were selected from the population-based British Columbian MS (BCMS) (n=5705) and the clinic-based Hôpital Notre-Dame, Quebec (CHUM) (n=1489) databases. Referral delay (BCMS) and diagnostic delay (CHUM) were examined by sex, onset age, disease course (primary progressive (PPMS) vs. relapsing at onset), onset symptoms (BCMS only) and year of first clinic visit/diagnosis. Cohorts were analyzed separately by stratified analyses and multivariable linear modeling. The relationship between referral delay and initial disability was examined by multiple ordinal regression in the BCMS cohort. Younger at onset patients or those with PPMS exhibited significantly longer delays (p<0.001). Delays decreased over the 20+ year period, but reductions varied by clinical course, onset age and sex. Long referral delays were associated with greater disability at first clinic visit (p<0.001). If early intervention at mild disability levels is warranted in MS, then the extended delays to medical recognition for young adult-onset and PPMS patients must be addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jns.2010.02.007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reasons for diagnostic delay in MS are multifactorial and often involve systemic barriers to healthcare access.

    “The reasons for this are multifactorial, and often involve systemic barriers to healthcare access. Although many studies have reported such diagnostic delay in MS care [8–12], only a few have documented specific misdiagnoses that were responsible for such delays (Table 1).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kingwell, E., Leung, A. L., Roger, E., Duquette, P., Rieckmann, P., & Tremlett, H.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia Hospital (CA)
  • Hôpital Notre-Dame (CA)
Corresponding author
Kingwell, Elaine
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
292
Issue
1-2
Pages
57-62
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090671899
Cited by
60
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (82738_1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, delayed diagnosis, late referral, primary progressive multiple sclerosis, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, age of onset, sex differences, clinical course, early intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Canada, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Prognosis, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies, Age of Onset, Disease Progression, Statistics, Nonparametric, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review