Cited by 51Folate and B Vitamins ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The MTHFR C677T polymorphism contributes to an increased risk for vascular dementia: a meta-analysis.

Liu, Hua, Yang, Min, Li, Guang-Ming, Qiu, Ya, Zheng, Jian, Du, Xin, Wang, Ji-Liang, Liu, Ruo-Wei·2010·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Background/aims Vascular dementia (VaD) is the second common cause of dementia after Alzheimer's disease (AD) in later life. The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism as a risk factor in VaD has been suggested, but direct evidence from genetic association studies remain inconclusive. We performed a meta-analysis pooling data from all relevant studies in order to determine the effect of the MTHFR C677T polymorphism on VaD. Methods We applied a random-effects or fixed-effects model to combine odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Q statistic was used to evaluate the homogeneity, and Egger's test and Funnel plot were used to assess publication bias. Results A total of 11 studies, comprising 672 cases and 1038 controls, were included worldwide. Publication bias was not observed. This meta-analysis demonstrated that the MTHFR T allele or TT genotype had an increased risk for VaD in general populations (OR, 95%CI: 1.27, 1.01-1.59; 1.41, 1.06-1.88, respectively), and a significant association was found in allele contrast, recessive, and dominant model in Asian populations, but not in Caucasian populations. Conclusion The MTHFR C677T polymorphism (mainly TT genotype) is associated with developing VaD in general populations or Asian populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jns.2010.04.001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, H., Yang, M., Li, G.-M., Qiu, Y., Zheng, J., Du, X., Wang, J.-L., & Liu, R.-W.
Affiliations
  • North Sichuan Medical University (CN)
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (CN)
  • Army Medical University (CN)
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
294
Issue
1-2
Pages
74-80
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042819148
Cited by
51
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
vascular dementia, MTHFR C677T polymorphism, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, genetic susceptibility, TT genotype, Asian populations, Caucasian population, genetic association
MeSH terms
Genotype, Humans, Polymorphism, Genetic, Dementia, Vascular, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2), White People, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review