Methodological challenges in designing dementia prevention trials—the European Dementia Prevention Initiative (EDPI)
Abstract
Recent epidemiological studies have indicated numerous associations between vascular and lifestyle related risk factors and incident dementia. However, evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCT) showing effectiveness of interventions aimed at these risk factors in preventing or postponing dementia onset is still lacking. Three large RCTs on multi-component interventions to prevent dementia (preDIVA, FINGER, MAPT) have been initiated in Europe to address these issues. Irrespective of some methodological differences, all three studies target cardiovascular and lifestyle related risk factors. Collaboration within the newly founded 'European Dementia Prevention Initiative' (EDPI) will allow for a comprehensive exploration of optimal target population, intervention and outcome measures, which are currently unknown. Combining data of the ongoing studies and running simulation analyses will facilitate determining the optimal design including accurate sample-size calculations for future multi-national clinical trials on dementia prevention. Interventions aiming at dementia prevention should be pragmatic and easy to implement on a large scale in different health care systems, without generating high additional costs or burden on participants or physicians. As the optimal age for intervention precedes the optimal age for outcome assessment, traditional trial designs might lead to suboptimal timing of either of the two. Separation of intervention and outcome assessment in time is a potential solution, but requires studies with very long follow-up. International collaboration of research groups with experience in dementia prevention studies and well-organised logistics for these major projects is pivotal to success for future large-scale dementia prevention studies. Founding of EDPI is an important first step in this direction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 121
- Authors
- Richard, E., Andrieu, S., Solomon, A., Mangialasche, F., Ahtiluoto, S., van Charante, E. P. M., Coley, N., Fratiglioni, L., Neely, A. S., Vellas, B., van Gool, W. A., & Kivipelto, M.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- University of Perugia (IT)
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Umeå University (SE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the Neurological Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 322
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 64-70
- ISSN
- 0022-510X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045463977
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
- WOS
- Funders
- ‘Internationale Society for Alzheimer Research’ (ISAO)
- New Investigators Research Grant (NIRG-10-173212)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- dementia prevention, vascular risk factors, lifestyle risk factors, cardiovascular risk factors, multicomponent intervention, finger, MAPT, trial design, sample size determination, intervention timing, international research collaboration
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Europe, Female, Humans, International Cooperation, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Research Design, Risk Factors, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Sample Size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review