Cited by 52Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The ASCOMALVA trial: association between the cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil and the cholinergic precursor choline alphoscerate in Alzheimer’s disease with cerebrovascular injury: interim results.

Amenta, Francesco, Carotenuto, Anna, Fasanaro, Angiola Maria, Rea, Raffaele, Traini, Enea·2012·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Background Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChE-Is) are among the drugs more largely used for the treatment of mild-to-moderate symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (AD), but beneficial long-term effects of these compounds on the cognitive, functional, and behavioural symptoms of the disease are small and not always apparent in practice. Preclinical investigations have suggested that association between ChE-Is and the cholinergic precursor choline alphoscerate enhances cholinergic neurotransmission more effectively than single compounds alone. The ongoing clinical trial on the "Effect of association between a ChE-I and choline alphoscerate on cognitive deficits in Alzheimer's disease associated with cerebrovascular injury" (ASCOMALVA) was designed to assess if association of the ChE-I donepezil with choline alphoscerate has a more favourable clinical profile than monotherapy with donepezil alone.Methods ASCOMALVA is a double-blind multicentre trial that has completed the first 12 months of observation of 91 patients of the 210 planned. Patients were aged between 56 and 91 years (mean 75 ± 10 years) and were included in the protocol with a MMSE score between 15 and 24. Patients with AD diagnosed according to the DSM IV criteria suffer from ischemic brain damage documented by neuroimaging (MRI and CT scan), with a score≥2 in at least one subfield of the New Rating Scale for Age-Related White Matter Changes (ARWMC). Patients were randomly allotted to an active treatment group (donepezil+choline alphoscerate) or to a reference treatment group (donepezil+placebo) and were examined after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment.Results Cognitive functions, patient's daily activities and behavioural symptoms were assessed by the Mini-Mental State Evaluation (MMSE), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), of severity and of caregiver distress measures (NPI-F and NPI-D). Patients of the reference group (donepezil+placebo) showed along the course of the 12months of observation, a slight time-dependent worsening of MMSE, ADAS-cog, IADL and NPI-D scores and no changes in the BADL and NPI-F scores. Donepezil plus choline alphoscerate improved compared to donepezil alone the different items analysed except the BADL.Conclusions The first results of the ASCOMALVA trial suggest that association of choline alphoscerate to the standard treatment with a ChE-I may represent an option to prolong beneficial effects of cholinergic therapies in AD with concomitant ischemic cerebrovascular injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jns.2012.07.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The only double-blind multicenter trial of α-GPC reported that donepezil plus α-GPC might slow progressive cognitive decline compared with donepezil alone among 113 participants with Alzheimer disease with cerebrovascular injury after 12 and 24 months.

    “The only double-blind multicenter trial of α-GPC reported that active treatment using the acetylcholinesterase inhibitors donepezil and α-GPC might slow progressive cognitive decline compared with donepezil treatment alone among 113 participants with Alzheimer disease with cerebrovascular injury after a 12- and 24-month observation period”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 52

Authors
Amenta, F., Carotenuto, A., Fasanaro, A. M., Rea, R., & Traini, E.
Affiliations
  • Università di Camerino (IT)
  • Ospedale Antonio Cardarelli (IT)
Corresponding author
Amenta, Francesco
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
322
Issue
1-2
Pages
96-101
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077019488
Cited by
52
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Unicam Scientific Publications (University of Camerino) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Division of Chemistry
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, donepezil, choline alphoscerate, cholinesterase inhibitors, combination therapy, cerebrovascular injury, ischemic brain injury, white matter changes, cognitive function, activities of daily living, behavioural symptoms, caregiver distress, cholinergic neurotransmission, interim results
MeSH terms
Donepezil, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycerylphosphorylcholine, Humans, Indans, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Piperidines, Treatment Outcome, Nootropic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review