Cited by 23Advanced Cellulose Research StudiesDyeing and Modifying Textile FibersLignin and Wood Chemistry

Textiles from Non-Wood Feedstocks: Challenges and Opportunities of Current and Emerging Fiber Spinning Technologies

Open access
Frazier, Ryen M., Lendewig, Mariana, Vera, Ramon E., Vivas, Keren A., Forfora, Naycari, Azuaje, Ivana, Reynolds, Autumn, Venditti, Richard +3 more·2024·Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts

Abstract

As the global population continues growing, the demand for textiles also increases, putting pressure on cotton manufacturers to produce more natural fiber from this already undersupplied resource. Synthetic fibers such as polyester (PET) can be manufactured quickly and cheaply, but these petroleum-based products are detrimental to the environment. With increased efforts to encourage transparency and create a more circular textile economy, other natural alternatives must be considered. This article discusses the existing condition and future possibilities for man-made cellulosic fibers (MMCFs), with an emphasis on using non-woody alternative feedstocks as a starting material. This work focuses on conversion technology suitable for producing textile-grade fibers from non-wood-based dissolving pulp, which may be different in nature from its woody counterpart and therefore behave differently in spinning processes. Derivatization and dissolution methods are detailed, along with spinning techniques and parameters for these processes. Existing research related to the spinning of non-woody-based dissolving pulp is covered, along with suggestions for the most promising feedstock and technology combinations. In addition, an emerging method of conversion, in which textile fibers are spun from a hydrogel made of an undissolved nano/micro-fibrillated fiber suspension, is briefly discussed due to its unique potential. Methods and concepts compiled in this review relate to utilizing alterna…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jobab.2024.07.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frazier, R. M., Lendewig, M., Vera, R. E., Vivas, K. A., Forfora, N., Azuaje, I., Reynolds, A., Venditti, R., Pawlak, J. J., Ford, E., & Gonzalez, R.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
410-432
ISSN
2369-9698 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400571493
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture (12513354, NCZ09489)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lignin and Wood Chemistry
Keywords
dissolving pulp, fiber spinning, cellulose dissolution, cellulose derivatization, synthetic fiber alternatives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review