Cited by 189Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

Towards carbon-neutral construction materials: Carbonation of cement-based materials and the future perspective

Lippiatt, Nicholas, Ling, Tung-Chai, Pan, Shu-Yuan·2020·Journal of Building Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101062

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lippiatt, N., Ling, T.-C., & Pan, S.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Hunan University (CN)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
Corresponding author
Ling, Tung-Chai
Venue
Journal of Building Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
28
Pages
101062
ISSN
2352-7102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2988827871
Cited by
189
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 3
FWCI
10.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Building Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Keywords
carbonation, cementitious materials, concrete, CO2 sequestration, carbon-negative concrete, concrete waste, CO2 emission reduction, carbon sink, calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review