Cited by 34Climate Change Communication and PerceptionClimate Change and Health ImpactsRisk Perception and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Australians report climate change as a bigger concern than COVID-19

Open access
Patrick, Rebecca, Garad, Rhonda, Snell, Tristan, Enticott, Joanne, Meadows, Graham·2021·The Journal of Climate Change and Health

Abstract

Australia experienced two public health emergencies in 2020 – the catastrophic bushfires and the global coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Whilst these were separate events, both have similar drivers arising from human pressures on the natural environment. Here we report on relative personal concerns of Australians in a survey implemented during the global COVID-19 pandemic. The study design was a cross sectional online survey administered between 11 August and 11 November 2020. The setting was an Australia-wide online population involving 5483 individuals aged ≥18 residing in Australia. Recruitment occurred in two stages: unrestricted self-selected community sample through mainstream and social media (N = 4089); and purposeful sampling using an online panel company (N = 1055). The sample was predominantly female (N = 3187); mean age of 52.7 years; and approximately representative of adults in Australia for age, location, state and area disadvantage (IRSD quintiles). Climate change was very much a problem for 66.3% of the sample, while COVID-19 was ranked at the same level by only 25.3%. Three times as many participants reported that climate change was very much a problem than COVID-19, despite responding at a time when Australians were experiencing Stage 2 through 4 lockdowns. Demographic differences relating to relative personal concerns are discussed. Even in the midst of the uncertainty of a public health pandemic, Australians report that climate change is their most significant personal problem. Australia needs to apply an evidence-based public health approach to climate change, like it did for the pandemic, which will address the climate change concerns of Australians.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100032

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Climate distress is experienced by all ages, in both rural and urban locations and across the socioeconomic spectrum.

    “Climate distress was experienced by all ages, in both rural and urban locations and across the socioeconomic spectrum. 20”

    From Understanding and managing psychological distress due to climate change (2023) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results (Problem ranking; page unavailable) report climate change as a personal problem across the surveyed adult age groups, urban and rural locations, and socioeconomic-disadvantage categories. But the Measures section (page unavailable) shows that the survey asked how much of a personal problem climate change was; it did not measure distress. The youngest respondents were 18, so the findings do not establish the claim for all ages. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Décieux, 2015, Implementation of the forced answering option within online surveys: do higher item response rates come at the expense of participation and answer quality?, Psihologija, 48, 311, 10.2298/PSI1504311D · DOI
  2. Ekholm, 2017, Parenthood and worrying about climate change: the limitations of previous approaches, Risk Anal, 37, 305, 10.1111/risa.12626 · DOI
  3. Schneider-Mayerson, 2020, Eco-reproductive concerns in the age of climate change, Clim Change, 163, 1007, 10.1007/s10584-020-02923-y · DOI
  4. Tranter, 2021, Social and political influences on environmentalism in Australia, J Sociol, 50, 331, 10.1177/1440783312459102 · DOI
  5. Patrick, 2021, Health promotion in the Anthropocene: the ecological determinants of health, Med J Aust, 214, S22

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Patrick, R., Garad, R., Snell, T., Enticott, J., & Meadows, G.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Monash Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Patrick, Rebecca
Venue
The Journal of Climate Change and Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
3
Pages
100032
ISSN
2667-2782 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3192103060
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
FWCI
10.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Climate Change and Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Deakin University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
climate change concern, COVID-19 pandemic, public health emergencies, Australian public opinion, bushfires, lockdown, evidence-based public health, climate change and health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review