Cited by 24Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Caregiver burden and influencing factors among family caregivers of patients with glioma: a cross-sectional survey

Li, Qianqian, Zhang, Liying, Chen, Chaoyi, Gan, Yajie, Jiang, Lin, Li, Shenjie, Xiang, Wei, Ming, Yang +2 more·2022·Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

Objective The main responsibility of caring for patients with glioma is assumed by family caregivers who experience a considerable burden during the care process. This study aimed to investigate the level of caregiver burden and explore its associated factors among family caregivers of patients with glioma. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study among 131 family caregivers of glioma patients from October 2017 to November 2019. We used the following measurement tools: a demographic questionnaire, the Zarit Burden interview (ZBI), the Hamilton anxiety and depression scale, and the family APGAR index. We used multiple linear regression analysis to determine the factors related to caregiver burden. Results The ZBI score for the family caregivers of glioma patients was 31.29 (SD = 13.54), and most caregivers (71.7%) reported moderate and severe caregiver burdens. Caregivers' daily sleep time and anxiety symptoms and patients' depressive symptoms independently predicted caregiver burden. Conclusions Family caregivers of glioma patients experienced a moderate burden. Personalised psychological intervention and sleep health guidance for patients and caregivers should be considered to reduce family caregiver burden and enhance the quality of life and mental health of both patients and their caregivers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.11.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 54 · Cited by 24

Authors
Li, Q., Zhang, L., Chen, C., Gan, Y., Jiang, L., Li, S., Xiang, W., Ming, Y., Yang, C., & Zhou, J.
Affiliations
  • Southwest Medical University (CN)
  • Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yang, Changmei
  • Zhou, Jie
Venue
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
96
Pages
107-113
ISSN
0967-5868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3215545703
Cited by
24
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
caregiver burden, family caregivers, glioma, Zarit Burden Interview, anxiety, depression, sleep duration, associated factors, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Caregiver Burden, Cross-Sectional Studies, Glioma, Humans, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Caregivers, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review