Caregiver burden and influencing factors among family caregivers of patients with glioma: a cross-sectional survey
Abstract
Objective The main responsibility of caring for patients with glioma is assumed by family caregivers who experience a considerable burden during the care process. This study aimed to investigate the level of caregiver burden and explore its associated factors among family caregivers of patients with glioma. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study among 131 family caregivers of glioma patients from October 2017 to November 2019. We used the following measurement tools: a demographic questionnaire, the Zarit Burden interview (ZBI), the Hamilton anxiety and depression scale, and the family APGAR index. We used multiple linear regression analysis to determine the factors related to caregiver burden. Results The ZBI score for the family caregivers of glioma patients was 31.29 (SD = 13.54), and most caregivers (71.7%) reported moderate and severe caregiver burdens. Caregivers' daily sleep time and anxiety symptoms and patients' depressive symptoms independently predicted caregiver burden. Conclusions Family caregivers of glioma patients experienced a moderate burden. Personalised psychological intervention and sleep health guidance for patients and caregivers should be considered to reduce family caregiver burden and enhance the quality of life and mental health of both patients and their caregivers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have shown that a significant number of family caregivers of patients with glioma report moderate to severe levels of burden, with respect to reduction in sleep duration and increased anxiety and depressive symptoms.
“Previous studies have shown that a significant number of family caregivers of patients with glioma report moderate to severe levels of burden, with respect to reduction in sleep duration and increased anxiety and depressive symptoms.9”
From Caregiver burden, quality of life, and psychosocial outcomes among informal caregivers of patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Empirical studies in patients with glioma suggest that caregiver burden is common and clinically meaningful.
“Empirical studies in patients with glioma suggest that caregiver burden is common and clinically meaningful.6, 7, 8, 9, 10”
From Caregiver burden, quality of life, and psychosocial outcomes among informal caregivers of patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 54 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Li, Q., Zhang, L., Chen, C., Gan, Y., Jiang, L., Li, S., Xiang, W., Ming, Y., Yang, C., & Zhou, J.
- Affiliations
- Southwest Medical University (CN)
- Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Changmei
- Zhou, Jie
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 96
- Pages
- 107-113
- ISSN
- 0967-5868 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3215545703
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Keywords
- caregiver burden, family caregivers, glioma, Zarit Burden Interview, anxiety, depression, sleep duration, associated factors, psychological intervention
- MeSH terms
- Caregiver Burden, Cross-Sectional Studies, Glioma, Humans, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Caregivers, Cost of Illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review