Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management
Abstract
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is characterized by increased intracranial pressure, manifested by papilledema and radiological findings, in the absence of an identifiable casual factor. The primary symptoms include headache, vision loss, and pulsatile tinnitus, and are recognized to have profound impacts on quality of life and visual function. IIH demonstrates a strong predilection towards obese women of reproductive age, and the population incidence is rising with the growing prevalence of obesity worldwide. The pathophysiology involves dysregulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics and venous sinus pressure, and recent studies highlighting the pathogenic role of metabolic and hormonal factors have led to the identification of several pharmacological targets and development of novel therapeutic agents. The overarching treatment goals include symptomatic alleviation and prevention of permanent vision loss. The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial, the first of its kind randomized controlled trial on IIH, provides class I evidence for treatment with weight loss and acetazolamide. In medically refractive or fulminant cases, optic nerve sheath fenestration, CSF diversion, and venous sinus stenting, have been successfully implemented. However, there are few high-quality prospective studies investigating the treatment and natural history of IIH, highlighting the compelling need for further research to determine the optimal treatment regimen.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension is a less common but serious consequence of obesity.
“Idiopathic intracranial hypertension, which typically presents with progressive and severe headaches, visual loss due to papilloedema, or both, is a less common but serious consequence of obesity.128”
From Definition and diagnostic criteria of clinical obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [128]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Definition and diagnostic criteria of clinical obesity
Rubino, F., Cummings, D. E., Eckel, R. H., Cohen, R. V., Wilding, J. P. H., Brown, W. A., Stanford, F. C., Batterham, R. L., Farooqi, I. S., Farpour-Lambert, N. J., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00316-4 · Cited by 1,811 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, M. T. M., Bhatti, M. T., & Danesh-Meyer, H. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Danesh-Meyer, Helen V.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 95
- Pages
- 172-179
- ISSN
- 0967-5868 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4200560660
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Keywords
- idiopathic intracranial hypertension, intracranial hypertension, papilledema, cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, obesity, pathophysiology, acetazolamide, weight loss, optic nerve sheath fenestration, CSF diversion, venous sinus stenting, blindness prevention
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Prospective Studies, Pseudotumor Cerebri, Quality of Life, Stents, Intracranial Hypertension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review