Cited by 5Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Failures of urge suppression in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Behavioral modeling using a blink suppression task

Open access
Bragdon, Laura B., Nota, Jacob A., Eng, Goi Khia, Recchia, Nicolette, Kravets, Pearl, Collins, Katherine A., Stern, Emily R.·2023·Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders

Abstract

Many individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) report sensory-based urges (e.g. 'not-just-right experiences') in addition to, or instead of, concrete fear-based obsessions. These sensations may be comparable to normative "urges-for-action" (UFA), such as the urge to blink. While research has identified altered functioning of brain regions related to UFA in OCD, little is known about behavioral patterns of urge suppression in the disorder. Using an urge-to-blink task as a model for sensory-based urges, this study compared failures of urge suppression between OCD patients and controls by measuring eyeblinks during 60-second blocks of instructed blink suppression. Cox shared frailty models estimated the hazard of first blinks during each 60-second block and recurrent blinks following each initial erroneous blink. OCD patients demonstrated a higher hazard of first and recurrent blinks compared to controls, suggesting greater difficulty resisting repetitive sensory-based urges. Within OCD, relationships between task outcomes and symptom severity were inconsistent. Findings provide support for a deficit in delaying initial urge-induced actions and terminating subsequent actions in OCD, which is not clearly related to clinical heterogeneity. Elucidating the nature of behavioral resistance to urges is relevant for informing conceptualizations of obsessive-compulsive psychopathology and optimizing treatment outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100824

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 5

Authors
Bragdon, L. B., Nota, J. A., Eng, G. K., Recchia, N., Kravets, P., Collins, K. A., & Stern, E. R.
Affiliations
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Bragdon, Laura B.
Venue
Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
38
Pages
100824
ISSN
2211-3649 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381620654
Cited by
5
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH111794, R33MH107589)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, not just right experiences, blink suppression, eyeblinks, clinical heterogeneity, symptom severity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review