Cited by 31Lattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesParticle Dynamics in Fluid FlowsGranular flow and fluidized beds

Inertial dilute particulate fluid flow simulations with an Euler–Euler lattice Boltzmann method

Trunk, Robin, Henn, Thomas, Dörfler, Willy, Nirschl, Hermann, Krause, Mathias J.·2016·Journal of Computational Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jocs.2016.03.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 31

Authors
Trunk, R., Henn, T., Dörfler, W., Nirschl, H., & Krause, M. J.
Affiliations
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Corresponding author
Trunk, Robin
Venue
Journal of Computational Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
17
Pages
438-445
ISSN
1877-7503 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2329819778
Cited by
31
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computational Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
Keywords
lattice Boltzmann method, particle-laden flow, drag force, boundary conditions, convection-dominated flow, Stokes number, particle deposition, numerical diffusion, Peclet number

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review