The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep Learning for the Radiographic Detection of Apical Lesions
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We applied deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to detect apical lesions (ALs) on panoramic dental radiographs. METHODS Based on a synthesized data set of 2001 tooth segments from panoramic radiographs, a custom-made 7-layer deep neural network, parameterized by a total number of 4,299,651 weights, was trained and validated via 10 times repeated group shuffling. Hyperparameters were tuned using a grid search. Our reference test was the majority vote of 6 independent examiners who detected ALs on an ordinal scale (0, no AL; 1, widened periodontal ligament, uncertain AL; 2, clearly detectable lesion, certain AL). Metrics were the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values. Subgroup analysis for tooth types was performed, and different margins of agreement of the reference test were applied (base case: 2; sensitivity analysis: 6). RESULTS The mean (standard deviation) tooth level prevalence of both uncertain and certain ALs was 0.16 (0.03) in the base case. The AUC of the CNN was 0.85 (0.04). Sensitivity and specificity were 0.65 (0.12) and 0.87 (0.04,) respectively. The resulting positive predictive value was 0.49 (0.10), and the negative predictive value was 0.93 (0.03). In molars, sensitivity was significantly higher than in other tooth types, whereas specificity was lower. When only certain ALs were assessed, the AUC was 0.89 (0.04). Increasing the margin of agreement to 6 significantly increased the AUC to 0.95 (0.02), mainly because the sensitivity increased to 0.74 (0.19). CONCLUSIONS A moderately deep CNN trained on a limited amount of image data showed satisfying discriminatory ability to detect ALs on panoramic radiographs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362
(2016) · Cited by 11,679
Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031619 · Cited by 8,733
Gulshan, V., Peng, L., Coram, M., Stumpe, M. C., Wu, D., Narayanaswamy, A., Venugopalan, S., Widner, K., Madams, T., Cuadros, J., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.17216 · Cited by 7,697
A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks
Sokolova, M., & Lapalme, G. (2009) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 · Cited by 7,515
STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., de Vet, H. C. W., et al. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h5527 · Cited by 3,660
A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networks
Buda, M., Maki, A., & Mazurowski, M. A. (2018) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2018.07.011 · Cited by 3,088
Cited by
Khanagar, S. B., Al-ehaideb, A., Maganur, P. C., Vishwanathaiah, S., Patil, S., Baeshen, H. A., Sarode, S. C., & Bhandi, S. (2021) · Journal of Dental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.019 · Cited by 676
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Caries Detection: A Review
Al-Khalifa, K. S., Ahmed, W. M., Azhari, A. A., Qaw, M., Alsheikh, R., Alqudaihi, F., & Alfaraj, A. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11090936 · Cited by 48
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Dental Medicine: A Critical Review
Sitaras, S., Tsolakis, I. A., Gelsini, M., Tsolakis, A. I., Schwendicke, F., Wolf, T. G., & Perlea, P. (2025) · International Dental Journal · doi:10.1016/j.identj.2024.11.009 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ekert, T., Krois, J., Meinhold, L., Elhennawy, K., Emara, R., Golla, T., & Schwendicke, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Endodontics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 917-922.e5
- ISSN
- 0099-2399 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2947000504
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 35.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Learning for the Radiographic Detection of Apical Lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.016
- The paper
- Ekert, T., Krois, J., Meinhold, L., Elhennawy, K., Emara, R., Golla, T., & Schwendicke, F. (2019). Deep Learning for the Radiographic Detection of Apical Lesions. Journal of Endodontics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.