Getting grey hairs in the labour market. An alternative experiment on age discrimination
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some experiments only look at a 6-year age gap (e.g. Baert et al., 2016), while others go as far as examining a 35-year age gap (e.g. Neumark et al., 2019).
“some experiments only look at a 6-year age gap (e.g.Baert et al., 2016), while others go as far as examining a 35-year age gap (e.g.Neumark et al., 2019).”
From The state of hiring discrimination: A meta-analysis of (almost) all recent correspondence experiments (2023) · cites this paper as Baert et al., 2016
Cites
No Foot in the Door: An Experimental Study of Employment Discrimination Against Older Workers
Bendick, M., Brown, L. E., & Wall, K. (1999) · Journal of Aging & Social Policy · doi:10.1300/j031v10n04_02 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Sonnet, A., Olsen, H., & Manfredi, T. (2014) · De Economist · doi:10.1007/s10645-014-9240-x · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lippens, L., Vermeiren, S., & Baert, S. (2023) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104315
Self-citation
- Authors
- Baert, S., Norga, J., Thuy, Y., & Van Hecke, M.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Baert, Stijn
- ORCID
- Baert, Stijn
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 57
- Pages
- 86-101
- ISSN
- 0167-4870 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3124371806
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 18.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Psychology (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- age discrimination, personnel selection, labor market, gray hair, resume screening, callbacks, career patterns, older workers, field experiments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review