Cited by 21Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsInfant Development and Preterm CareNursing education and management

Effect of the postpartum hospital environment on the attainment of mothers’ and fathers’ goals

Open access
Gaboury, Jenny, Capaday, Shalisa, Somera, Jennifer, Purden, Margaret·2017·Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing

Abstract

Objective To describe mothers' and fathers' goals in the postpartum period and how the hospital environment enables or hinders the attainment of these goals.Design A qualitative descriptive design was used to explore participants' perceptions.Setting Mothers and fathers were recruited on the postpartum unit of an urban hospital.Participants Ten mothers and eight fathers participated.Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted with mothers and fathers individually. Data analysis occurred concurrently with data collection and informed subsequent interviews.Results Mothers and fathers expressed similar goals: developing parenting competence and fulfilling personal needs. Their narratives indicated that the organizational environment with the mission to promote and provide baby-friendly and family-centered care and the human environment of responsive nursing were closely aligned with their goals. In contrast, the routines of the unit and the physical environment were not consistent with parents' goals or the mission of the organization.Conclusion Nurses have important advocacy roles in ensuring that all dimensions of the postpartum environment support the ability of parents to attain their goals and align with the philosophy of care of the organization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jogn.2016.08.008

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several researchers reported that women identified an unmet need for education about their own physical recovery and self-care, but no researchers measured maternal self-care education.

    “Several researchers (Almalik, 2017; Gaboury et al., 2017; Rodrigues et al., 2014; Sell et al., 2012), reported that women identified an unmet need for education about their own physical recovery and self-care, but no researchers measured maternal self-care education.”

    From Scoping Review of Postpartum Discharge Education Provided by Nurses (2022) · cites this paper as Gaboury et al., 2017

    The paper’s background section reports that mothers in a cited study prioritized teaching on self-care, including episiotomy and perineal care, more than nurses did. Its “Fulfilling Personal Needs” section also identifies mothers’ concern with recovery, pain, and wound care. Neither passage establishes that this paper’s participants reported an unmet need for education about their own recovery, or that no researchers measured maternal self-care education; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Women reported wanting more time with nurses.

    “Women reported wanting more time with nurses (Gaboury et al., 2017).”

    From Scoping Review of Postpartum Discharge Education Provided by Nurses (2022) · cites this paper as Gaboury et al., 2017

    In “The Postpartum Environment” (page unavailable), a mother appreciates a nurse taking time to demonstrate breastfeeding, and some parents report delayed responses to call bells. Neither passage says women reported wanting more time with nurses. Searches for “more time with nurses” and for mothers wanting nurses to spend more time with them found no such report in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.68)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 21

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 0b013e31823851d5 · DOI

Authors
Gaboury, J., Capaday, S., Somera, J., & Purden, M.
Affiliations
Vanier College (CA)
Corresponding author
Gaboury, Jenny
Venue
Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
40-50
ISSN
  • 0090-0311 (ISSN-L)
  • 0884-2175
OpenAlex
W2553942933
Cited by
21
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
parenting goals, mothers, fathers, parenting competence, family-centered care, nursing advocacy, physical environment, organizational mission, postpartum unit
MeSH terms
Adult, Fathers, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Mothers, Social Support, Parenting, Postpartum Period, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review