Cited by 11Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

Emotional Effect of the Loss of One or Both Fetuses in a Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy

Druguet, Mònica, Nuño, Laura, Rodó, Carlota, Arévalo, Silvia, Carreras, Elena, Gómez-Benito, Juana·2018·Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing

Abstract

Objective To examine the psychological effect on women of the loss of one or both fetuses during a monochorionic twin pregnancy and to identify associated protective and risk factors. Design Descriptive, cross-sectional, correlational study. Setting Maternity unit of the Vall d'Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Participants Twenty-eight White Spanish women who lost one or both fetuses during a monochorionic twin pregnancy. Methods In an individual interview with each participant, we collected sociodemographic information, psychiatric history, and clinical data regarding the pregnancy. Participants also completed the following questionnaires: Spanish Short Version of the Perinatal Grief Scale, Impact of Event Scale-Revised, Beck Depression Inventory, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Results Greater levels of grief after fetal loss during a monochorionic twin pregnancy were associated with increased symptoms of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress. The intensity of grief did not depend on the number of weeks of pregnancy at which the loss occurred, a history of miscarriage, the survival of one of the twins, the presence of living children, or any of the sociodemographic variables considered. Conclusion Fetal loss in a monochorionic twin pregnancy has a considerable emotional effect and leaves the mother vulnerable to psychological problems. The survival of one of the twins or the presence of living children is no guarantee that the grieving mother's…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.01.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intensity of grief was not determined by the period of the pregnancy at which the loss occurred, previous miscarriages, the presence of living children, the survival of one of the twins, or any of the sociodemographic variables examined.

    “In a descriptive cross-sectional, correctional study in Spain by Druguet et al. (2018), the researchers concluded that intensity of grief was not determined by the period of the pregnancy at which the loss occurred, previous miscarriages, the presence of living children, the survival of one of the twins, or any of the sociodemographic variables examined.”

    From Integrative Review of Emotional Care Following Perinatal Loss (2021) · cites this paper as Druguet et al. (2018)

  • When a perinatal loss occurs in a multiple pregnancy, as part of mourning a mother needs to recognize the distinct identity of each twin and allow herself to grieve the deceased twin.

    “When a perinatal loss occurs in a multiple pregnancy, as part of the elaboration of mourning a mother needs to recognize the distinct identity of each of the twins, and allow herself to grieve the deceased twin (Druguet et al., 2018).”

    From Integrative Review of Emotional Care Following Perinatal Loss (2021) · cites this paper as Druguet et al., 2018

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 39 · Cited by 11

Authors
Druguet, M., Nuño, L., Rodó, C., Arévalo, S., Carreras, E., & Gómez-Benito, J.
Venue
Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
137-145
ISSN
  • 0090-0311 (ISSN-L)
  • 0884-2175
OpenAlex
W2786090308
Cited by
11
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Keywords
monochorionic twin pregnancy, fetal death, perinatal grief, maternal depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, psychological impact, twin survival
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Fetal Death, Grief, Hospitals, University, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Mothers, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Socioeconomic Factors, Spain, Twins, Monozygotic, Incidence, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Risk Assessment, Pregnancy, Twin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review