Clinical presentation of endometriosis identified at interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization: Prospective series of 465 cases
Abstract
Objectives Women seeking sterilization are usually parous and have no major complains, such as pelvic pain. This could be a good model to indirectly assess the prevalence of endometriosis in the general population. Prevalence of endometriosis in women undergoing tubal sterilization by laparoscopy has been assessed in 17 published reports. Results indicate a surprising wide variation of prevalence of endometriosis, ranging from 1.4% to 43.3%. This clinical study describes the prevalence and clinical presentations of endometriosis identified at interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization, as a close representation of endometriosis in general population. Material and methods From July 1989 to February 2009, 465 women undergone interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization and were included in this series. Surgery was realised in a non universitary centre of gynecologic surgery. All patients were operated on by the same surgeon. A complete assessement of pelvic organs was achieved with a particular attention paid for endometriotic lesions. Endometriosis when present was staged according to r-AFS classification. Biopsies were sent for pathological examination to assess endometriosis. Results Mean age of women was 40.7 years (range 15-49 years). 20 women were nulliparous and 12 others had a past history of endometriosis. Endometriosis was visually identified in 55 patients (11.82%), and confirmed by histologic examination in most of cases (50/55: 90.9%). The mean age of women presenting endometriosis at the onset of tubal ligation was 41.27 years. Cases with endometriosis were classified according to the r-AFS. 39,7,8 and 1 cases corresponded to stages I, II, III and IV respectively. In the 20 nulliparous women, the prevalence of endometriosis was 20% (4/20). At the time of laparoscopic sterilization, 91 women presented a painfull condition (dysmenorrhea mainly or dyspareunia). Endometriosis was identified in 16 of them (17.58%). In the group of 360 asymptomatic parous women, the prevalence of endometriosis was 10% (36/360). Nulliparity, associated pelvic pain and retroverted uterus were associated with increased prevalence of endometriosis, without being significant. Conclusion In our study, the prevalence of endometriosis identified at interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization was 11.82%. In parous asymptomatic women, the prevalence of endometriosis was 10%. The prevalence of endometriosis was slightly increased in nulliparous women, when pain was associated and in women with a retroverted uterus.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies looking for asymptomatic endometriosis among women undergoing tubal ligation yielded rates of endometriosis centering around 19%.
“These studies yielded rates of endometriosis that center around 19% (Barbosa et al., 2009; Rawson, 1991; Tissot et al., 2017).”
From Endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome are diametric disorders (2021) · cites this paper as Tissot et al., 2017
Cites
Endometriosis in pregnant and non-pregnant women at tubal sterilization
Moen, M. H., & Muus, K. M. (1991) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137411 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome are diametric disorders
Dinsdale, N. L., & Crespi, B. J. (2021) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.13244 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“These studies yielded rates of endometriosis that center around 19% (Barbosa et al., 2009; Rawson, 1991; Tissot et al., 2017).”
BackgroundHager, M., Wenzl, R., Riesenhuber, S., Marschalek, J., Kuessel, L., Mayrhofer, D., Ristl, R., Kurz, C., & Ott, J. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm8081210 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Chaggar, P., Tellum, T., Thanatsis, N., De Braud, L. V., Setty, T., & Jurkovic, D. (2023) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.26175 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tissot, M., Lecointre, L., Faller, E., Afors, K., Akladios, C., & Audebert, A.
- Affiliations
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR)
- Hôpital d'Hautepierre (FR)
- Institut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l’Appareil Digestif (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Tissot, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 647-650
- ISSN
- 2468-7847 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2614399315
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
- Keywords
- endometriosis, laparoscopic sterilization, endometriosis prevalence, endometriosis staging, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, nulliparous women, parous women, pelvic pain, endometriosis detection
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Parity, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies, Sterilization, Tubal, Prevalence, Pelvic Pain, Incidental Findings, Young Adult, Asymptomatic Diseases, Uterine Retroversion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review