Yolk sac size & shape as predictors of first trimester pregnancy outcome: A prospective observational study
Abstract
Objective To determine the value of yolk sac size and shape for prediction of pregnancy outcome in the first trimester.Material and methods 500 pregnant women between 6+0 and 9+6 weeks of gestation underwent transvaginal ultrasound and yolk sac diameter (YSD), gestational sac diameter (GSD) were measured, presence/absence of yolk sac (YS) and shape of the yolk sac were noted. Follow up ultrasound was done to confirm fetal well-being between 11+0 and 12+6 weeks and was the cutoff point of success of pregnancy.Results Out of 500 cases, 8 were lost to follow up, YS was absent in 14, of which 8 were anembryonic pregnancies. Thus, 478 out of 492 followed up cases were analyzed for YS shape and size and association with the pregnancy outcome. In our study, abnormal yolk sac shape had a sensitivity and specificity (87.06% & 86.5% respectively, positive predictive value (PPV) of 58.2%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.8% in predicting a poor pregnancy outcome as compared to yolk sac diameter (sensitivity and specificity 62.3% & 64.1% respectively and PPV and NPV of 27.3% and 88.7% respectively). The degree of association for both the variables was significant to the level of p<0.000.Conclusion The presence or absence of yolk sac has a strong predictive value for poor pregnancy outcome. Yolk sac shape was a better predictor of poor pregnancy outcome in terms of higher specificity and negative predictive value as compared to yolk sac diameter.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Abnormal yolk sac size and appearance are useful markers for miscarriage prediction before the demonstration of fetal viability.
“Abnormal yolk sac size and appearance have been reported to be useful markers for miscarriage prediction before the demonstration of fetal viability [27].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 25
- Authors
- Suguna, B., & Sukanya, K.
- Affiliations
- Bangalore Baptist Hospital (IN)
- Venue
- Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 159-164
- ISSN
- 2468-7847 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2899431876
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Keywords
- yolk sac, yolk sac diameter, gestational sac diameter, first trimester, pregnancy outcome prediction, anembryonic pregnancy, transvaginal ultrasound, fetal well-being, early pregnancy loss
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Yolk Sac, Ultrasonography, Prenatal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review