Cited by 33Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementBirth, Development, and HealthDiabetes Management and Research

Pregnancy outcomes of women with hypoglycemia in the oral glucose tolerance test

Bayraktar, Burak, Balıkoğlu, Meriç, Kanmaz, Ahkam Göksel·2020·Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of hypoglycemia measured using 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) on neonatal biometrics (birth weight, head circumference and body length of newborns) and perinatal outcomes. Materials and methods According to the definition of hypoglycemia by the American Diabetes Association, women with blood glucose levels of ≤70 mg/dL after fasting or at 1 or 2 h after eating measured using on 2-h 75-g OGTT were grouped into a hypoglycemia group. In accordance with the criteria of World Health Organization and the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups, as per the 2-h 75-g OGTT performed in the second trimester, women with gestational diabetes and were excluded from the study. Also, women meeting the following criteria were excluded from the study: missing records, aged th gestational week, and ≤500-g newborn. Other exclusion criteria included pregnant women with known type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, gestational or essential hypertension, cigarette and/or alcohol abuse, thyroid disease, BMI of 30, placental abnormalities with variation and/or dysfunction, intrauterine growth restriction, and abnormalities of the umbilical cord. Results A total of 625 pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Hypoglycemia was found in 71 pregnant women according to 2-h 75-g OGTT. The remaining 554 women were grouped into the normoglycemia group. The birth weight, head circ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101703

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayraktar, B., Balıkoğlu, M., & Kanmaz, A. G.
Affiliations
Izmir Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Bayraktar, Burak
Venue
Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
101703
ISSN
2468-7847 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3003554416
Cited by
33
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
oral glucose tolerance test, birth weight, head circumference, body length, perinatal outcomes, second trimester
MeSH terms
Adult, Apgar Score, Birth Weight, Body Height, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Head, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Infant, Newborn, Parity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Body Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review