Implementing the international evidence-based guideline of assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): how to achieve weight loss in overweight and obese women with PCOS?
Abstract
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder in women. Many of these women are overweight or obese. A minor weight loss of 5%-10% can significantly reduce reproductive, metabolic and psychological symptoms of PCOS and is recommended as a first step in the treatment of overweight or obese women with PCOS. Many weight loss programs have been proposed, but optimal methods on how to achieve the recommend weight loss are lacking. The aim of this systematic review was to generate practical tools for health professionals to guide women with PCOS towards a sustainable healthier lifestyle. PRISMA guidelines were used to conduct the systematic review. Eleven randomized controlled trials were found eligible for inclusion. Lifestyle modification strategies consisted of a diet, physical exercise, behavioural coaching or combined interventions. Mean weight loss ranged from +0.5 to -10.6 % of the initial body weight. However, the majority of the studies reported considerable drop-out rates varying between 12% and 47%. The heterogeneity of the described interventions and the high drop-out rates impede extrapolation of these results to daily clinical care. Hence, none of the described interventions seems superior to another in achieving substantial weight loss. In conclusion, the need for obtaining a healthier weight in overweight and obese women with PCOS is now well accepted. However, achieving this goal remains a challenge for both patients and healthcare providers. More research focusing on the multidisciplinary approach of lifestyle modification advice in daily practice is needed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A large proportion of the literature is focused on weight loss for individuals with PCOS.
“A large proportion of the literature is focused on weight loss for individuals with PCOS [42,43,44,45]”
From Moving beyond Weight: A Narrative Review of the Dietary and Lifestyle Management for Reducing Cardiometabolic Risk in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) (2023) · cites this paper as [45]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Lie Fong, S., Douma, A., & Verhaeghe, J.
- Affiliations
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
- Venue
- Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 101894
- ISSN
- 2468-7847 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3049194228
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- polycystic ovary syndrome, weight loss, obesity, overweight women, lifestyle modification, diet, physical activity, intervention dropout, sustainable lifestyle change
- MeSH terms
- Diet, Reducing, Female, Humans, Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Weight Loss, Exercise, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Overweight, Weight Reduction Programs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review