The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks
Open accessAbstract
Scientific collaboration and endorsement are well-established research topics which utilize three kinds of methods: survey/questionnaire, bibliometrics, and complex network analysis. This paper combines topic modeling and path-finding algorithms to determine whether productive authors tend to collaborate with or cite researchers with the same or different interests, and whether highly cited authors tend to collaborate with or cite each other. Taking information retrieval as a test field, the results show that productive authors tend to directly coauthor with and closely cite colleagues sharing the same research interests; they do not generally collaborate directly with colleagues having different research topics, but instead directly or indirectly cite them; and highly cited authors do not generally coauthor with each other, but closely cite each other.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998) · Computer Networks and ISDN Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7552(98)00110-x · Cited by 16,004
Garfield, E. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471 · Cited by 2,788 · cited 1×
“Citation analysis focuses on counting the number of citations in different ways, which can be viewed as calculating the degree of nodes in various citation graphs without taking graph topology into consideration (e.g., impact factor (Garfield, 1972)).”
BackgroundCronin, B. (2001) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.1097 · Cited by 500
Cited by
Digital twin application in the construction industry: A literature review
Opoku, D.-G. J., Perera, S., Osei-Kyei, R., & Rashidi, M. (2021) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102726 · Cited by 753
Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective
Li, E. Y., Liao, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012 · Cited by 473
Siders, A. R. (2019) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.573 · Cited by 268
The relationship between research performance and international collaboration in chemistry
Kato, M., & Ando, A. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1011-y · Cited by 75
Dondio, P., Casnici, N., Grimaldo, F., Gilbert, N., & Squazzoni, F. (2019) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.018 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Informetrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187-203
- ISSN
- 1751-1577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967516159
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.008
- The paper
- Ding, Y. (2011). Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. Journal of Informetrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.