Predatory Journals: Who Publishes in Them and Why?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Features that may signal a possible predatory nature of a journal include APC charges usually much lower than credible OA journals, requests to pay APC only after acceptance, absence or questionable location and composition of editorial boards, members lacking academic competencies, and failure to clearly declare manuscript submission, revision, acceptation, and licensing policies.
“For instance, the APC charges of predatory journals are usually much lower when compared with the APCs applied by credible OA journals. Additionally, often authors are requested to pay APC only after the acceptance of their manuscript. Other features include the absence or a questionable location and composition of journal editorial boards, as their members are often lacking academic competencies.”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [158]
OA journals are particularly attractive to authors pressurized for high publication productivity.
“Thus, OA journals are particularly attractive to authors pressurized for high publication productivity [158-160].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [158]
Predatory journals have evolved and manage to pass the selection process of major bibliographic and OA databases.
“these artificial journals have evolved and they even manage to pass the selection process of the major bibliographic, as well as OA, DBs [145,150,157,158,166]”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [158]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 245
- Authors
- Demir, S. B.
- ORCID
- Demir, Selcuk Besir
- Venue
- Journal of Informetrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1296-1311
- ISSN
- 1751-1577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2901580463
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 18.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Informetrics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Keywords
- predatory journals, fake journals, journal editors, publish or perish, developing countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review