Enhancing the Quality of the Anesthesia to Postanesthesia Care Unit Patient Transfer Through Use of an Electronic Medical Record–Based Handoff Tool
Abstract
Purpose Anesthesia to postanesthesia care unit (PACU) handoffs are often incomplete, imprecise, and highly variable with respect to information transfer, and therefore can jeopardize patient safety. A standardized anesthesia to PACU electronic medical record (EMR)-based patient handoff checklist was implemented and evaluated for its effect on the information transfer. Design An observational preimplementation and postimplementation design was used. Methods Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of information transfer during the PACU handoff was performed for a convenience samples of 100 patients preimplementation, 3 weeks postimplementation, and 3 months postimplementation. Findings The mean percentage of total handoff checklist items addressed significantly increased 3 weeks and 3 months postimplementation compared with baseline. Conclusions The use of a standardized anesthesia to PACU EMR-based handoff checklist significantly increased the percent of accurate information transferred without considerably affecting the duration of the PACU handoff process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Handoff-related information gaps are common for postoperative patients.
“Nevertheless, handoff-related information gaps are common for postoperative patients.10,25–28”
From Potential uses of AI for perioperative nursing handoffs: a qualitative study (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
Can We Make Postoperative Patient Handovers Safer? A Systematic Review of the Literature
Segall, N., Bonifacio, A. S., Schroeder, R. A., Barbeito, A., Rogers, D., Thornlow, D. K., Emery, J., Kellum, S., Wright, M. C., & Mark, J. B. (2012) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e318253af4b · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Potential uses of AI for perioperative nursing handoffs: a qualitative study
King, C. R., Shambe, A., & Abraham, J. (2023) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad015 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Halladay, M. L., Thompson, J. A., & Vacchiano, C. A.
- Corresponding author
- Halladay, Margaret L.
- ORCID
- Thompson, Julie A.
- Venue
- Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 622-632
- ISSN
- 1089-9472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2903809276
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- electronic health records, post-anesthesia care unit, information transmission, patient safety, perioperative care
- MeSH terms
- Anesthesiology, Humans, Recovery Room, Time Factors, Checklist, Electronic Health Records, Quality Improvement, Patient Safety, Patient Handoff
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review