Cited by 16Hospital Admissions and OutcomesPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsElectronic Health Records Systems

Enhancing the Quality of the Anesthesia to Postanesthesia Care Unit Patient Transfer Through Use of an Electronic Medical Record–Based Handoff Tool

Halladay, Margaret L., Thompson, Julie A., Vacchiano, Charles A.·2019·Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing

Abstract

Purpose Anesthesia to postanesthesia care unit (PACU) handoffs are often incomplete, imprecise, and highly variable with respect to information transfer, and therefore can jeopardize patient safety. A standardized anesthesia to PACU electronic medical record (EMR)-based patient handoff checklist was implemented and evaluated for its effect on the information transfer. Design An observational preimplementation and postimplementation design was used. Methods Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of information transfer during the PACU handoff was performed for a convenience samples of 100 patients preimplementation, 3 weeks postimplementation, and 3 months postimplementation. Findings The mean percentage of total handoff checklist items addressed significantly increased 3 weeks and 3 months postimplementation compared with baseline. Conclusions The use of a standardized anesthesia to PACU EMR-based handoff checklist significantly increased the percent of accurate information transferred without considerably affecting the duration of the PACU handoff process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jopan.2018.09.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halladay, M. L., Thompson, J. A., & Vacchiano, C. A.
Corresponding author
Halladay, Margaret L.
Venue
Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
622-632
ISSN
1089-9472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903809276
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
electronic health records, post-anesthesia care unit, information transmission, patient safety, perioperative care
MeSH terms
Anesthesiology, Humans, Recovery Room, Time Factors, Checklist, Electronic Health Records, Quality Improvement, Patient Safety, Patient Handoff

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review