Cited by 5Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryDietary Effects on HealthAnesthesia and Pain Management

Preoperative Oral Carbohydrate-Containing Fluid Versus Plain Water in Elective Cesarean Deliveries: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Thakur, Sunil, Kanwar, Manjit Singh, Sharma, Anurag, Kaushal, Sushruti, Marwaha, Poojan Dogra, Sharma, Nisha, Kumar, Ravinder·2025·Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing

Abstract

Purpose Traditional prolonged fasting regimens have recently been replaced with guidelines to take carbohydrate-rich clear fluids until 2 hours before surgery. With this study, we wanted to study if the addition of carbohydrates to preoperative oral fluids confers any advantage. Design Randomized clinical trial. Methods The study was conducted at a single center in North India among singleton pregnancies at term, scheduled for elective cesarean section under subarachnoid block. Participants were randomized into 2 groups of 50 participants each. The "Carbohydrate group" received 400 mL of fluid containing 50 g of glucose, while the "plain water" group received 400 mL of water 2 to 4 hours before surgery. A visual analog scale was used to assess hunger, thirst, anxiety, fatigue, and nausea before surgery. Intraoperative mean arterial pressure, hypotension, nausea, and vomiting were noted. On the first postoperative day, recovery from anesthesia was assessed using the Quality of recovery from anesthesia- 40 (QoR-40) questionnaire. Blood sugar levels were compared on the first postoperative day and in cord blood. Findings Preoperative visual analog scale scores for hunger, thirst, anxiety, nausea, and fatigue were similar in both groups. The occurrence of hypotension (P = .688) and phenylephrine use (P = .39), recovery from anesthesia (P = .92), cord blood sugar levels (P = .24), and postoperative blood sugar levels were also not significantly different in both groups (P = .81). Conclusion This study did not find any significant advantage of preoperative carbohydrate-containing fluid over preoperative plain water in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under Subarachnoid block.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thakur, S., Kanwar, M. S., Sharma, A., Kaushal, S., Marwaha, P. D., Sharma, N., & Kumar, R.
Affiliations
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur (IN)
  • Government of Himachal Pradesh (IN)
Corresponding author
Kaushal, Sushruti
Venue
Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-04
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
326-330
ISSN
1089-9472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401405555
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
preoperative fasting, elective cesarean section, spinal anesthesia, preoperative anxiety, intraoperative hypotension, phenylephrine, postoperative recovery, quality of recovery, postoperative blood glucose, cord blood glucose, nausea and vomiting
MeSH terms
Adult, Carbohydrates, Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, India, Pregnancy, Preoperative Care, Water, Elective Surgical Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review